Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cburke11
    Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 11

    #1

    Strange Result in Deseq Output

    I have a quick question about Deseq. I have 4 conditions in which there is a strain factor and a day factor (eg. Day 1 Strain 1, Day 2 Strain 1, Day 1 Strain 2, Day 2 Strain 2). I have all of these in a large data matrix in Deseq with all conditions and their replicates (n=2 for each point).


    row.names DBE DUZ D7UZ D7BE DBE2 DUZ2 D7BE2 D7UZ2
    1 CL10000Contig1 20 222 75 50 8 19 206 183
    2 CL10001Contig1 1 1 74 257 45 20 174 10
    3 CL10002Contig1 67 222 316 441 87 95 561 320
    4 CL10003Contig1 1 39 69 61 21 10 377 36
    5 CL10004Contig1 10 68 203 232 54 127 249 156
    7 CL10005Contig1 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0

    For some of the rows in this matrix this means that expression level may be at 0 for a locus for all data points except for 1 condition. I am next doing pairwise comparisons between 2 conditions at once. My problem is that in my out put I have a list of significant genes returned by "resSigD <-resD[resD$padj <0.1,]" but at the bottom of this list I have some row that are listed as NA.1, NA.2, NA.3 and so on for about 400 rows.. do you know what is causing this problem? Could it be that I am making a pairwise comparison between two conditions but all expression values are 0?

    Any insight would be greatly appreciated!

    Thanks! Please let me know if you need more info
  • Simon Anders
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 995

    #2
    If a gene has zero counts in all samples involved in the comparison, the p value is NA. This confuses the subsetting. Use "resSigD <-resD[which(resD$padj <0.1),]" to get rid of the extra NAs.

    Comment

    • cburke11
      Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 11

      #3
      Thank you for your help Simon. That seems to do the trick

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...