Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pinki999
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 37

    DESeq, elevated SD in lower count range even after VST

    Hi,

    I am using DESeq for differential expression analysis. When I transformed the data for variance stabilization using varianceStabilizingTransformation from DESeq, I still see an elevated standard deviation in the lower count range. Does anyone have come across similar issue? I am using appox. 50 vs 50 replicates. Does large number of replicates creates such elevation?..



    Thanks
  • Richard Barker
    Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 47

    #2
    Can you share the code/script you used as it might make the issue a bit clearer?

    Comment

    • pinki999
      Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 37

      #3
      Hi,

      I used the code according to the vigenette:

      countTable = read.table("count_data.txt", header=TRUE, row.names=1)
      condition = factor(c(rep("A", 44), rep("B", 21), rep("C", 55)))
      cds = newCountDataSet( countTable, condition )
      cds = estimateSizeFactors( cds )
      cdsBlind = estimateDispersions( cds, method="blind" )
      vsd = varianceStabilizingTransformation( cdsBlind )

      I am also attaching the meanSdPlot. First plot is from log transformed data and the second is from VST.

      thanks,
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • Richard Barker
        Member
        • Apr 2012
        • 47

        #4
        Could you explain what the numbers and letters refer to in the following line?

        condition = factor(c(rep("A", 44), rep("B", 21), rep("C", 55)))

        I

        Comment

        • pinki999
          Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 37

          #5
          Hi,

          A, B and C are the conditions and the numbers represent the replicates.

          Comment

          • Richard Barker
            Member
            • Apr 2012
            • 47

            #6
            Wow, thats a lot of replicates, so your initial table has 120 columns? And in the first row 44 of them just have A, 23 have B and 55 are C?
            I've heard of an experiment with so many rep's before so i'm trying to imagine the table structure.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            14 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
            0 responses
            26 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
            0 responses
            37 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
            0 responses
            61 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...