Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pinki999
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 37

    DESeq, elevated SD in lower count range even after VST

    Hi,

    I am using DESeq for differential expression analysis. When I transformed the data for variance stabilization using varianceStabilizingTransformation from DESeq, I still see an elevated standard deviation in the lower count range. Does anyone have come across similar issue? I am using appox. 50 vs 50 replicates. Does large number of replicates creates such elevation?..



    Thanks
  • Richard Barker
    Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 47

    #2
    Can you share the code/script you used as it might make the issue a bit clearer?

    Comment

    • pinki999
      Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 37

      #3
      Hi,

      I used the code according to the vigenette:

      countTable = read.table("count_data.txt", header=TRUE, row.names=1)
      condition = factor(c(rep("A", 44), rep("B", 21), rep("C", 55)))
      cds = newCountDataSet( countTable, condition )
      cds = estimateSizeFactors( cds )
      cdsBlind = estimateDispersions( cds, method="blind" )
      vsd = varianceStabilizingTransformation( cdsBlind )

      I am also attaching the meanSdPlot. First plot is from log transformed data and the second is from VST.

      thanks,
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • Richard Barker
        Member
        • Apr 2012
        • 47

        #4
        Could you explain what the numbers and letters refer to in the following line?

        condition = factor(c(rep("A", 44), rep("B", 21), rep("C", 55)))

        I

        Comment

        • pinki999
          Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 37

          #5
          Hi,

          A, B and C are the conditions and the numbers represent the replicates.

          Comment

          • Richard Barker
            Member
            • Apr 2012
            • 47

            #6
            Wow, thats a lot of replicates, so your initial table has 120 columns? And in the first row 44 of them just have A, 23 have B and 55 are C?
            I've heard of an experiment with so many rep's before so i'm trying to imagine the table structure.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            13 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            26 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            33 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...