Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • spidermonkey
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 2

    #1

    Tophat-fusion-post outputting no fusions

    I'm trying to get fusion post running on human data, yet fusion-post returns 0 fusions. These samples had been run using a different index, with a non-zero amount of fusion results, therefore I'm not sure why this isn't working. The g1k index however needs to be used on these samples, and I'm using the same index for fusion-post as was used for aligning the tophat reads. The directory setup apart from the index should otherwise be identical to the working setup.

    My directory structure:
    Code:
    tophat_299aM
    tophat_299bN
    tophat_299bT
    
    mcl
    ensGene.txt
    refGene.txt
    
    blast
    The blast directory contains symlinks to human_genomic, other_genomic and nt blast files. The index contains bowtie1 built human g1k index files (tophat with fusion was run using bowtie1).

    Code:
    [Tue Jan 15 11:49:19 2013] Beginning TopHat-Fusion post-processing run (v2.0.6)
    -----------------------------------------------
    [Tue Jan 15 11:49:19 2013] Extracting 23-mer around fusions and mapping them using Bowtie
    [Tue Jan 15 11:54:09 2013] Filtering fusions
            Processing: tophat_299aM/fusions.out
            Processing: tophat_299bN/fusions.out
            Processing: tophat_299bT/fusions.out
            0 fusions are output in ./tophatfusion_out/potential_fusion.txt
    [Tue Jan 15 11:55:06 2013] Blasting 50-mers around fusions
    [Tue Jan 15 11:55:06 2013] Generating read distributions around fusions
    [Tue Jan 15 11:55:06 2013] Reporting final fusion candidates in html format
            num of fusions: 0
    -----------------------------------------------
    [Tue Jan 15 11:55:06 2013] Run complete [00:05:47 elapsed]
    I'm using the following parameters to run fusion-post on a cluster with 64GB of allocated memory to the job:

    Code:
    tophat-fusion-post -p 8 --num-fusion-reads 1 --num-fusion-pairs 1 --num-fusion-both 0 bowtie1_g1k_idx/human_g1k_v37
    I get this output with 0 potential fusions (the fusions.out files in the sample directories are non-empty):
    Code:
       
    drwxr-xr-x  7 user dir    131072 Jan 15 11:55 .
    drwxr-x--- 10 user dir    131072 Jan 16 10:30 ..
    drwxr-xr-x  2 user dir    131072 Jan 15 11:55 blast_genomic
    drwxr-xr-x  2 user dir    131072 Jan 15 11:55 blast_nt
    drwxr-xr-x  2 user dir    131072 Jan 15 11:55 check
    -rw-r--r--  1 user dir 984352595 Jan 15 11:53 fusion_seq.bwtout
    -rw-r--r--  1 user dir 154987245 Jan 15 11:49 fusion_seq.fa
    -rw-r--r--  1 user dir 195266454 Jan 15 11:54 fusion_seq.map
    drwxr-xr-x  2 user dir    131072 Jan 15 11:55 logs
    -rw-r--r--  1 user dir         0 Jan 15 11:55 potential_fusion.txt
    -rw-r--r--  1 user dir   1120412 Jan 15 11:55 result.html
    -rw-r--r--  1 user dir         0 Jan 15 11:55 result.txt
    -rw-r--r--  1 user dir        18 Jan 15 10:19 sample_list.txt
    drwxr-xr-x  2 user dir    131072 Jan 15 11:54 tmp
    I feel like I've tried everything suggested in the other threads where people have had the same problem. Any ideas?
  • jp.
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 142

    #2
    Hi
    did you get solution ?

    Comment

    • spidermonkey
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 2

      #3
      Unfortunately, no. Our solution was to use another fusion detector (defuse) instead.

      Comment

      • jp.
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2013
        • 142

        #4
        I think I can tell you something cos I have successfully used tophat-fusion.
        Please post your commands and directory structure and pwd.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Today, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        67 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        47 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...