Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kristoffer Knudsen
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 1

    #1

    Cuffdiff normalization issue

    I think that CuffDiff (from cufflinks ) might have a normalization issue!

    I'm using the Tophat/cufflinks/cuffdiff pipeline to analyze RNA-seq data from a WT and knockout (KO) mouse. Both done in dublicates.

    But when I make the scatterplot of WT vs KO using the FPKM values from Cuffdiff there is a general shift towards WT being more expressed than KO as seen here:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	CuffDiifScatter.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	108.0 KB
ID:	308021

    I've plotted each replicates combination separately to be consistent with the plots below. The red line is the 1:1 ratio (where the bulk of the values are expected to be) and the blue line is the dy/dx mean created with geom_smooth() from ggplot2 (Generalized additive models with integrated smoothness estimation).

    This pattern probably originates from the raw read counts as the shift is also seen in the raw data, as showed here:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	RawScatter.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	132.9 KB
ID:	308022

    Even though the shift is not as pronounced in the raw data.

    I think it is a normalization problem because when I take the raw read counts and normalize them using EdgeR ( calcNormFactors() ) the shift is much smaller, as seen here:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	EdgeRscatter.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	132.5 KB
ID:	308023

    I'm using Cufflinks v 2.0.2 and the iGenome as refrences.
    I get these results regardless of how I run Cuffdiff. I've tried using the following parameter combination:

    only mandatory parameters
    -N
    -N -M myGTF
    -N -M myGTF -b
    -N -M myGTF -b -u

    And I always get the same results. Furthermore I have had a similar problem with another mouse data-set created by a completely different experimental protocol.

    Does anyone have good suggestions of how to make CuffDiff work?
    Last edited by Kristoffer Knudsen; 02-11-2013, 06:10 AM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    Yesterday, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:52 AM
0 responses
5 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:39 AM
0 responses
14 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
0 responses
15 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...