Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kristoffer Knudsen
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 1

    #1

    Cuffdiff normalization issue

    I think that CuffDiff (from cufflinks ) might have a normalization issue!

    I'm using the Tophat/cufflinks/cuffdiff pipeline to analyze RNA-seq data from a WT and knockout (KO) mouse. Both done in dublicates.

    But when I make the scatterplot of WT vs KO using the FPKM values from Cuffdiff there is a general shift towards WT being more expressed than KO as seen here:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	CuffDiifScatter.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	108.0 KB
ID:	308021

    I've plotted each replicates combination separately to be consistent with the plots below. The red line is the 1:1 ratio (where the bulk of the values are expected to be) and the blue line is the dy/dx mean created with geom_smooth() from ggplot2 (Generalized additive models with integrated smoothness estimation).

    This pattern probably originates from the raw read counts as the shift is also seen in the raw data, as showed here:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	RawScatter.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	132.9 KB
ID:	308022

    Even though the shift is not as pronounced in the raw data.

    I think it is a normalization problem because when I take the raw read counts and normalize them using EdgeR ( calcNormFactors() ) the shift is much smaller, as seen here:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	EdgeRscatter.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	132.5 KB
ID:	308023

    I'm using Cufflinks v 2.0.2 and the iGenome as refrences.
    I get these results regardless of how I run Cuffdiff. I've tried using the following parameter combination:

    only mandatory parameters
    -N
    -N -M myGTF
    -N -M myGTF -b
    -N -M myGTF -b -u

    And I always get the same results. Furthermore I have had a similar problem with another mouse data-set created by a completely different experimental protocol.

    Does anyone have good suggestions of how to make CuffDiff work?
    Last edited by Kristoffer Knudsen; 02-11-2013, 06:10 AM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
    by SEQadmin2



    CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

    Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
    ...
    07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
    by SEQadmin2


    Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

    The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
    ...
    07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
0 responses
33 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
0 responses
51 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...