Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • adrian
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 90

    Cuffdiff - results replicates

    Hi:

    I have 4 different cell types. A , B, C and D. Each class has 4 replicates.

    In Cuffdiff, I gave replicates with comma separated lines

    A1.bam, A2.bam, A3.bam,A4.bam B1.bam,b2.bam,b4.bam ... and so on.


    From gene_exp.diff, I wanted to get list of differentially expressed genes.
    I observe that cuffdiff also compared q1 q2 (which is a1.bam a2.bam).

    why cuffdiff comparing between two replicates. Could anyone provide their expert input.

    Also is this the only file to look for differentially expressed genes?

    Thanks
    Adrian
  • Bukowski
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 388

    #2
    q1 and q2 will be the replicate groups, not the sample id's if you've specified your replicate groupings correctly.

    Use -L to specify labels instead

    genes_exp.diff is the gene level summaries of the differential expression testing between conditions.

    The other diff files are summaries of the differential expression at transcript leve, tss level, cds level etc.

    Comment

    • adrian
      Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 90

      #3
      Hi :
      Thanks for your reply.

      A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 C3 D1 D2 D3

      If q1, q2, Q3 and Q4 are replicate groups, I should not get anything above q4 since I have only 4 replicate groups. However, I am seeing in columns Sample_1 and Sample_2:

      q1 q4

      q1 q8

      q1 q9

      q1 q12

      etc.

      This lead me to think that cuffdiff is comparing every replicate sample to other samples in other groups and reporting the significant FDR (yes or no calls).

      Yes, I did not specify -L option.


      Is the following correct syntax for -L option?

      cuffdiff combined.gtf -L sample1, sample2, sample3 and sample4 a1.bam,a2.bam,a3.bam b1.bam,b2.bam,b3.bam c1.bam,c2.bam,c3.bam d1.bam,d2.bam,d3.bam


      Thanks a lot again.

      -Adrian

      Comment

      • DonDolowy
        Member
        • Oct 2012
        • 56

        #4
        cuffdiff combined.gtf -L sample1,sample2,sample3,sample4 a1.bam,a2.bam,a3.bam b1.bam,b2.bam,b3.bam c1.bam,c2.bam,c3.bam d1.bam,d2.bam,d3.bam

        This should be the right one.

        Comment

        • adrian
          Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 90

          #5
          Thanks a lot for your reply.

          I have one more question:

          Is is okay if I do cuffdiff only on two replicate groups.

          Say cuffdiff between a1,a2,a3 and b1,b2,b3 only.

          since my cuffmerge gtf assembly file is made from all samples in the experiment, will I loose power by only comparing two replicate groups and not all.

          Thanks again.

          -Adrian

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          24 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          34 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          34 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...