Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chongm
    Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 21

    DNA-seq and Read Trimming: Basic Question

    Hi Everyone:

    I am doing exome sequencing and I just had a basic question about read trimming. Is read trimming at the 3' end AND/OR by base quality score completely necessary? What influence will NOT trimming have on downstream variant calling? I was thinking that low quality bases would be accounted for by their low base qualities and thus we would not have to completely omit or "trim" these bases?

    Thanks,

    MC
  • simonandrews
    Simon Andrews
    • May 2009
    • 870

    #2
    There are two reasons to trim, either to remove poor quality sequence (quality trimming) or to remove adapter sequence where your read length is long enough that it's read through your insert and into the adapter on the other end.

    For long reads adapter trimming is very useful. Depending on the construction of your library it is possible to end up with a significant proportion of your library containing some adapter sequence. If you don't trim this then you will leave non-native sequence on the end of your reads which will cause all kinds of problems with subsequent mapping or assembly.

    Quality trimming is not quite so clear. If you have a fully quality aware analysis pipeline then it's arguable that you should leave all base calls in and let the downstream analysis make what use out of them that it can. In reality many tools are not quality aware, or make a somewhat crude use of qualities such that you get better results from completely removing poor quality data. From a practical point of view you can also run your analysis more quickly if you initially filter your data to remove calls that you're pretty confident are never going to tell you anything useful.

    Comment

    • chongm
      Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 21

      #3
      Okay this is much more clear to me now! Thanks a lot!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...