Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • m_elena_bioinfo
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 99

    read different length in fastq

    Dear,
    I have performed two runs (targeted sequencing) on miseq using 2x150bp protocol. Unusually, I have obtained fastq containing reads of different length, that during alignment step cause misalignment errors (and a lot of false positives). Any idea for the reason? Any idea to fix it?
  • Apexy
    Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 62

    #2
    Hello,
    I do not think read length is the problem except the reads incorporate many uncalled and wrong bases. Did you perform read thinning or trimming ? By false positive, do you mean that the reads align elsewhere than expected ordo you mean the reads do not have a hit? What is he range of read lengths? What alignment tool are you using? What are you aligning the reads to.

    Comment

    • mastal
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 666

      #3
      read different lengths in fastq

      Hi elena,

      My experience with Illumina sequencing is that all the reads should be the same length.

      Have the reads been trimmed to remove low quality regions or adaptor sequences?

      Best wishes,
      Maria

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...