Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hari_iyer16
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 8

    coverageBed error: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'

    Hi all,
    I am trying to run coverageBed from Bedtools in a cluster.
    I connected to the cluster using the following parameters:
    qrsh -l mem_free=10G,h_vmem=12G,h_stack=256M

    Following is the command I ran:
    coverageBed -a BED_Files/chip.bed -b hg18_chromInfo.txt | sortBed -i stdin > new/chip.coverage

    where, hg18_chromInfo.txt is the file defining the bins/windows in which the sequencing coverage has to be summarized.

    I get the following error:

    terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
    what(): St9bad_alloc
    /local/gcc-4.1.2/install/shortread/bin/coverageBed: line 2: 1221 Aborted ${0%/*}/bedtools coverage "$@"

    I have no idea what the error means. Could someone please help troubleshooting. I tried googlins and seems that this error is not a specific instance of Bedtools error.

    Thanks for your time.
    Hari
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Is the hg18_chromInfo.txt file in bed format?

    Comment

    • hari_iyer16
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2013
      • 8

      #3
      @GenoMax: Yes, it is in Bed format. In fact the actual name used in the command is windows.bed. I changed the names while posting here to avoid cryptic names.

      Here is the first few lines from the windows.bed or hg18_chromInfo.txt
      chr1 0 199
      chr1 200 399
      chr1 400 599
      chr1 600 799
      chr1 800 999
      chr1 1000 1199


      Here is the first few lines from chip.bed
      chr1 5 55 HWI-ST1191:621BA5ACXX:7:2306:6657:50696 1 -
      chr1 14 62 HWI-ST1191:621BA5ACXX:6:1115:19691:10876 1 +
      chr1 47 97 HWI-ST1191:621BA5ACXX:5:1310:19552:92789 1 +
      chr1 47 97 HWI-ST1191:621BA5ACXX:5:1316:8676:35703 1 +
      chr1 47 97 HWI-ST1191:621BA5ACXX:5:2316:17113:98272 1 +



      Thanks.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Have you tried to capture both standard out and standard error from job submission?
        Is the error you posted the only output?

        How large are the two BED files you are using? Have these files been edited on Windows?

        Comment

        • hari_iyer16
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2013
          • 8

          #5
          The chip.bed is 4.8G, and the windows.bed (hg18_chromInfo.txt) is 352M.
          I figured the error is due to memory problems, and based on a suggestion from another mailing group, I used the -counts option in coverageBed:
          coverageBed -counts -a BED_Files/chip.bed -b windows.bed | sortBed -i stdin > new/chip.coverage

          However, still I am not able to run it because of memory issues. Got the following error by email [over the day at least I learnt to submit a batch job to the cluster and get a report of the job by email ;-) ]
          Job 607506 (new) Aborted
          Exit Status = 137
          Signal = KILL
          Start Time = 04/11/2013 21:50:39
          End Time = 04/11/2013 22:01:39
          CPU = 00:11:15
          Max vmem = 12.024G
          failed assumedly after job because:
          job 607506.1 died through signal KILL (9)


          I think I am not doing anything fancy here and many do this as routine. Generally for such a job, what memory specs are used?

          Thanks.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          55 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...