Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hari_iyer16
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 8

    coverageBed error: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'

    Hi all,
    I am trying to run coverageBed from Bedtools in a cluster.
    I connected to the cluster using the following parameters:
    qrsh -l mem_free=10G,h_vmem=12G,h_stack=256M

    Following is the command I ran:
    coverageBed -a BED_Files/chip.bed -b hg18_chromInfo.txt | sortBed -i stdin > new/chip.coverage

    where, hg18_chromInfo.txt is the file defining the bins/windows in which the sequencing coverage has to be summarized.

    I get the following error:

    terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
    what(): St9bad_alloc
    /local/gcc-4.1.2/install/shortread/bin/coverageBed: line 2: 1221 Aborted ${0%/*}/bedtools coverage "$@"

    I have no idea what the error means. Could someone please help troubleshooting. I tried googlins and seems that this error is not a specific instance of Bedtools error.

    Thanks for your time.
    Hari
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Is the hg18_chromInfo.txt file in bed format?

    Comment

    • hari_iyer16
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2013
      • 8

      #3
      @GenoMax: Yes, it is in Bed format. In fact the actual name used in the command is windows.bed. I changed the names while posting here to avoid cryptic names.

      Here is the first few lines from the windows.bed or hg18_chromInfo.txt
      chr1 0 199
      chr1 200 399
      chr1 400 599
      chr1 600 799
      chr1 800 999
      chr1 1000 1199


      Here is the first few lines from chip.bed
      chr1 5 55 HWI-ST1191:621BA5ACXX:7:2306:6657:50696 1 -
      chr1 14 62 HWI-ST1191:621BA5ACXX:6:1115:19691:10876 1 +
      chr1 47 97 HWI-ST1191:621BA5ACXX:5:1310:19552:92789 1 +
      chr1 47 97 HWI-ST1191:621BA5ACXX:5:1316:8676:35703 1 +
      chr1 47 97 HWI-ST1191:621BA5ACXX:5:2316:17113:98272 1 +



      Thanks.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Have you tried to capture both standard out and standard error from job submission?
        Is the error you posted the only output?

        How large are the two BED files you are using? Have these files been edited on Windows?

        Comment

        • hari_iyer16
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2013
          • 8

          #5
          The chip.bed is 4.8G, and the windows.bed (hg18_chromInfo.txt) is 352M.
          I figured the error is due to memory problems, and based on a suggestion from another mailing group, I used the -counts option in coverageBed:
          coverageBed -counts -a BED_Files/chip.bed -b windows.bed | sortBed -i stdin > new/chip.coverage

          However, still I am not able to run it because of memory issues. Got the following error by email [over the day at least I learnt to submit a batch job to the cluster and get a report of the job by email ;-) ]
          Job 607506 (new) Aborted
          Exit Status = 137
          Signal = KILL
          Start Time = 04/11/2013 21:50:39
          End Time = 04/11/2013 22:01:39
          CPU = 00:11:15
          Max vmem = 12.024G
          failed assumedly after job because:
          job 607506.1 died through signal KILL (9)


          I think I am not doing anything fancy here and many do this as routine. Generally for such a job, what memory specs are used?

          Thanks.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2


            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.

            Probing...
            Today, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            Yesterday, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          7 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          6 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          9 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...