Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • all_your_base
    Member
    • Mar 2012
    • 40

    #1

    JIGSAW gene prediction combiner - use for prokaryotes?!

    Hi, I have a recently assembled bacterial genome. It consists of a a couple dozens scaffolds, and I have put them through three gene prediction methods: Prodigal, Glimmer, and GeneMark.

    Now that I have three different gtf files describing putative genes, I want to somehow combine these results into a consensus list. I have been looking into such a combiner called JIGSAW and was wondering if anyone has experience using this software with bacteria (I think it was made with eukarylotes in mind).

    I am running with the following command:

    jigsaw -l -f "myGenome.fasta" -m "jigsaw.output" -e "myEvidenceFile"

    And my evidence file looks like this:

    scaffolds_GeneMark.gff gff geneprediction coding 1.0
    scaffolds_Prodigal.gff gff geneprediction coding 1.0
    scaffolds_Glimmer.gff gff geneprediction coding 1.0

    Typically, JIGSAW wants the user to provide the type of exon that was annotated (start, internal, end, etc), but since this is a prokaryote, I thought maybe it was best just to use the "coding" identifier.

    The problem is, for a particular contig that has an average of 10 genes predicted from each individual method (7 of which overlap perfectly between all three methods), JIGSAW is only predicting 2 genes!

    Any comments or suggestions and much appreciated
  • Inma
    Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 25

    #2
    I did the same. I predicted ORFs in a complete bacteria genome by glimmer, genemark and prodigal. However, how I can integrate all this information and decide which ORFs are the most probables ones and which ones are not?

    Comment

    • Loddi
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 3

      #3
      Look on Pubmed for "Reganor", I remember this software does exactly this combination of different gene prediction tools.

      Best,
      Loddi

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2




        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
        Today, 06:46 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      15 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      68 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...