Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • carmeyeii
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 137

    #1

    DESeq Standard Comparison or Multifactorial / Model Fitting?

    Hi,

    I'm analyzing a dataset with DESeq, which consists of two time-points and two genotypes. I am not very knowledgeable in statistics, sadly, and I am a bit lost as to whether I should use DESeq under the "standard" comparison mode, or make use of the more "advanced" GLM regressions facet.

    The comparisons are between :

    Code:
    GenotypeA/Timepoint1  VS  GenotypeA/Timepoint2
    GenotypeB/Timepoint1  VS  GenotypeB/Timepoint1
    
    GenotypeA/Timepoint1  VS  GenotypeB/Timepoint1
    GenotypeA/Timepoint2  VS  GenotypeB/Timepoint2
    My understanding is that although my experimental design involves two factors (genotype and timepoint), since my comparisons are only changing one factor at a time, I have nothing to do performing Linear Regressions / Model Fitting, but I am not sure of this. Perhaps it would make sense to use the multi-factorial design analysis if I were to compare
    Code:
    GenotypeA/Timpepoint1 VS GenotypeB/Timepoint 2
    ?

    Also, what if I want to create a PCA plot of the libraries? Is that a sensible reason to use a GLM fit?

    Thanks, and sorry for the extreme confusion.

    Carmen
  • Wolfgang Huber
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 109

    #2
    Dear Carmen

    you are right that for the first set of comparisons you mention pairwise comparisons of the relevant sets of samples is good enough.

    Linear models / ANOVA type of analyses will become relevant if you want to deconvolve the combined effects of genotype and time on gene expression, and/or if you want to see if the effects of these factors just add up, or interact in more subtle ways. If you want to follow up this type of question, an elementary book about ANOVA or talking to a statistician might be enlightening.

    Best wishes
    Wolfgang
    Wolfgang Huber
    EMBL

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
      by SEQadmin2



      CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

      Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
      ...
      07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
      by SEQadmin2


      Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

      The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
      ...
      07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
    0 responses
    33 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
    0 responses
    43 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...