Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Amative
    Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 45

    #1

    Clustering RNA-Seq RPKM/ReadsCount issues

    Hello all,

    I have an RNA-Seq expression data, both RPKM/ReadsCount. Number of records in each dataset is ~35,000 gene.

    The samples are organised as follows:
    Tissue #1: 5 stages , 2 replicates for each stage. Total 10 samples
    Tissue #2: 5 stages , 2 replicates for each stage. Total 10 samples

    What I want to do with the expression data is basically clustering. I need to cluster each tissue separate from the other for now.

    A couple of issues I came across:
    • What is the correct way to deal with missing values as I have many of them scattered all over the dataset?
    • I read that it good to get rid of those genes that have zero ReadsCount in more than a specific percentage (30%, 40%, 50% ... ) of the samples? makes sense to me, but I dunno if it is correct!
    • What kind of data should go into the clustering process (RPKM, ReadsCount, add 0.00001 to all RPKM values, take the log2 , then calculate the standard normalized value of each RPKM
    • Should replicates go into the clustering, or values from both replicates of each samples need to normalized in some way to produce one value (this way I will end up with 5 columns for each sample)?



    I would really appreciate any kind of help with each of the above issues
  • Amative
    Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 45

    #2
    Any help, please!

    Comment

    • dpryan
      Devon Ryan
      • Jul 2011
      • 3478

      #3
      The shortest answer would be to simply refer you to section 7 of the DESeq vignette as an example.

      I should add, that there are multiple ways to do this sort of thing. Also, biological replicates should be kept separate, otherwise you'd might as well not have bothered running them.

      Comment

      • muthu545
        Member
        • Jul 2011
        • 32

        #4
        Hi,

        For Read counts data set matrix (35000 genes * 20 samples),
        First filter all the genes that is zero across all the samples.

        Second, load the filtered dataset in R using DESeq package --> perform size factor normalization -->
        and apply 20-40% (your choice, whichever works better) quantile filtering to filter out the low expressed genes.

        Third, use the filtered dataset from above to calculate the distance matrix
        and then used pclust function to perform clustering of the samples.

        I'm not sure the same could be applied for RPKMs.... you could use the cummeRbund
        package to cluster the samples based on RPKM values if the RPKMs was derived from cufflinks suite with differential expression data from cuffidiff.

        I hope this will work for you and cluster the 2 tissue samples separately.

        Thanks
        --
        Muthu

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
          by SEQadmin2



          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
          ...
          Today, 11:01 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 02:55 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
        0 responses
        12 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...