Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JonB
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 85

    #1

    Tophat2/prep_reads error: unrecognized option '--max-seg-multihits'

    I know there are several posts about 'prep_reads', but they concern the Sanger/Phred quality issue. I think mye problem is different.

    I am trying to map single-end illumina reads. They are sequenced with the CASAVA 1.8 and later pipeline, so I have kept the default values regarding quality scores.

    I have mapped such reads without problems before, but now I always get error at the prep_reads stage:

    Code:
    [2013-06-02 12:53:23] Beginning TopHat run (v2.0.7)
    -----------------------------------------------
    [2013-06-02 12:53:23] Checking for Bowtie
                      Bowtie version:        2.0.6.0
    [2013-06-02 12:53:23] Checking for Samtools
                    Samtools version:        0.1.18.0
    [2013-06-02 12:53:23] Checking for Bowtie index files
    [2013-06-02 12:53:23] Checking for reference FASTA file
    [2013-06-02 12:53:23] Generating SAM header for sycon-genome
            format:          fastq
            quality scale:   phred33 (default)
    [2013-06-02 12:53:24] Preparing reads
            [FAILED]
    Error running 'prep_reads'
    Usage:   prep_reads <reads1.fa/fq,...,readsN.fa/fq>

    And inside the prep_reads log:

    Code:
    /cluster/home/jonbra/bin/prep_reads: unrecognized option '--max-seg-multihits'
    Any tips on what is wrong?
  • mastal
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 666

    #2
    Tophat2/prep_reads error: unrecognized option '--max-seg-multihits'

    What was the command you used to run Tohat?

    Comment

    • JonB
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 85

      #3
      Code:
      tophat2 -p 8 --library-type fr-firststrand -o /output genome-file /seq-data.fastq
      And here's a sample of the sequence data:
      Code:
      @HWI-ST486:386:D1UMHACXX:3:1101:1440:2126 1:N:0:ACAGTG
      NTAACATTGTTTAAATGGAGAAAATAACCGTATGAAGAAGTTAATGAAGTTAATGCTGCTGGCAAGTGCCAGTTTAACCGTGGGTTGTGCAACATCTGATA
      +
      #11AA1B?BDA<BDB9ACFCFFIC4FFCF>)8CC:?D9?D:9BDDDDEEDDIA>D9?DEIC=CACDCEEC7=ACEEDDDA??@<35?81>>>A99::>AAA
      @HWI-ST486:386:D1UMHACXX:3:1101:1389:2165 1:N:0:ACAGTG
      AACTTTTAACGGTGGATCTCTTGGCTCGTGGATCGATGAAGAAAGCAGCAAACTGCGATACGTAGTGTGAATTGCAGAATTCAGTGAATCATCGAATTTTT
      +
      @@?DDBBDF<FFFIIBGEHAEHIE3A<?DAF=@0??B<DFD<D/9.)88CCF>@CCE'=<B?73;;3;@(;B@:5((5>@BA:>5:(;3:A>@99?A####
      @HWI-ST486:386:D1UMHACXX:3:1101:1363:2167 1:N:0:ACAGTG
      TTTATTTGGTTAGGGCTGAGGTAGTGACAAGTTCACTACCTCTTTTAAAAAAAACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATGGAAGGACAAAACGCTTCACC
      +
      @@@DDDDDHHHDHIIIIIIGIB3AABA4?CC?C??BD<?;B<?FGI<DCGGEEHIIFHFHEBBBBBBBB@@BBBB##########################
      Last edited by JonB; 06-02-2013, 11:30 AM.

      Comment

      • JonB
        Member
        • Jan 2010
        • 85

        #4
        I think maybe the problem is that I have sequenced small RNAs, and my reads are all 100 bps. I forgot to trim the Poly-A stretches and low quality bases...

        Also I think I only need to run Bowtie and not Tophat, as I do not expect spliced small RNAs.

        Comment

        • JonB
          Member
          • Jan 2010
          • 85

          #5
          I talking mostly to myself here... but I solved the problem (or at least it works now).

          I forgot that I had sequenced smallRNAs, so I had to remove Poly-A stretches from the oligodT probe and other sequence on the 5'-end (sometimes it was sequenced all the way through the Poly-A stretch).

          And I also mapped using bowtie2 instead of Tophat2. No need to look for splice junctions when I have smallRNA data I reckon.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          19 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          36 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...