Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ugolino
    Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 14

    #1

    DESeq: intepreting results from interaction analysis

    Hi there,

    I am using DESeq to infer differential gene expression in a 2-factor design. Factor 1 (strain) and Factor 2 (condition) each have 4 levels; 3 bioreps each totaling to 48 samples. I am interesed in identifying an interaction effect between strain and condition, on gene expression:

    > fit1 = fitNbinomGLMs( cdsFull, count ~ strain + condition + strain : condition )
    > fit0 = fitNbinomGLMs( cdsFull, count ~ strain + condition )
    > pvalsGLM = nbinomGLMTest( fit1, fit0 )
    > padjGLM = p.adjust( pvalsGLM, method='BH' )
    > DEresults <- transform( fit1, pval=pvalsGLM, padj=padjGLM )

    Attached are results for few significant genes. I am trying to understand the fold changes and p values.
    1. How do I identify which strain and which condition have a significant interaction, ie which comparison is the padj referring to? Do I need to do pairwise comparisons of each strain against each condition?

    2. If the Intercept represents foldchange ratio of strain1 : condition1, are the other columns subtracted differences in fold change?

    I can't seem to grasp the output, any tip is greatly appreciated.

    thanks
    Attached Files

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    Yesterday, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
71 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...