Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • eleven
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 9

    different reads length samples in same experiment

    Hello! everyone.

    I am working on the Hiseq PE (DNA) data, and some samples have 100bp PE and other samples have 90bp PE. So my question is if we can use those data for analysis in one experiment and same methods without any processing (after QC), or we can trim the different length to the same length such as 70bp, then analysis them using same methods. So which method is better?

    Thank you!
  • mastal
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 666

    #2
    different reads length samples in same experiment

    It depends what you are going to do with your data, and what software you are going to use to analyse it.

    Some programs might want the reads to be all the same length.

    Some applications, such as de novo assembly, might work better if the reads are trimmed to remove adapter sequences and poor quality bases.

    Comment

    • westerman
      Rick Westerman
      • Jun 2008
      • 1104

      #3
      Going along with Mastal's comments, since you have genomic PE data then it is likely that you with either be doing mapping to a known genome or a de-novo assembly. In either case most programs will not care about differing lengths. Perhaps obviously once you remove adapter sequences then you will have different read lengths. Since most programs work with trimmed reads (although this step is often not needed for known genome mapping) then the programs are capable of working with different lengths.

      What I find is that most programs are not capable of working with paired end and single end data in the same file nor, when working with PE data only, having the pairs out of order.

      Also I'd say that at least half of the programs I use are not capable of mixing up different types of reads; e.g., handling 454 reads along with Illumina hiSeq reads.

      If you want to tell us explicitly what you want to do and/or the programs you are going to use then we can give you more specific help.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...