Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JamieHeather
    @jamimmunology
    • Nov 2012
    • 96

    FLASH not pairing obvious reads

    I've been trying to use FLASH to combine reads that should overlap in read 1 and 2 in a recent MiSeq 2x251 run, but it seems to be missing obvious overlaps.

    My data is a pool of four amplicons of different length (roughly 320, 340, 420 and 430 bp long), so I should be getting overlaps from ~70 to 180bp, depending on the amplicon.

    When I run FLASH however, it only combines about 30% of the reads. If I look in the files of reads it doesn't combine, I can see reads that should easily be detected - e.g. reads that have 200 bases of 100% identical sequence.

    Here's the command I'm using:

    flash -m 30 -M 220 -r 251 -f 376 -s 56 file1.fq file2.fq

    So -m 30 -M 220 is a minimum overlap size of 30 and maximum overlap of 220 bases (I'm being generous in the size allowance, as my amplicons have a variable length section in the middle). -r is then read length, f is average fragment length, with the standard deviation of s.

    If I BLAST some of the paired reads that don't get overlaps found, I can easily find ones with huge overlaps (as well as finding some that did get combined that shouldn't have!).

    Any ideas what I might be doing wrong?
  • JackieBadger
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 385

    #2
    I'm guessing (from your previous post) that these are MHC amplicons?
    I would say that your different length amplicons should be conserved enough where you do not need to specify the over lap.
    Have you not tried running flash with no preset options?
    I have done this on MHC and it correctly joins say 99% of PE reads.

    Comment

    • JamieHeather
      @jamimmunology
      • Nov 2012
      • 96

      #3
      They're actually TCR amplicons (hence the MHC interest!), so there is a fair bit of length deviation even within an amplicon.

      I did try just default options, which produces a similar 30% success rate (a % or so less than the one above) - which I find odd, as the default max overlap is 70bp, which should only really just allow some of my smaller amplicons.

      Comment

      • JackieBadger
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 385

        #4
        I would try to demultiplex your amplicon products by size as much as possible just so you can try to figure out the issue.
        First off, are all of your PE1 and PE2 sequences in corresponding order between the files?
        Can you de-multiplex these based on primer sequence i.e. does each amplicon of a particular length have its own primer set?

        Comment

        • JamieHeather
          @jamimmunology
          • Nov 2012
          • 96

          #5
          Yep, the reads are in order in each file. Thanks, I'll try demultiplexing on the primers and seeing how they do!
          Last edited by JamieHeather; 07-16-2013, 08:57 AM.

          Comment

          • JamieHeather
            @jamimmunology
            • Nov 2012
            • 96

            #6
            Ah-ha, now this is interesting - once demultiplexed two of the amplicons give combine at >90%, while the other two don't even manage a % between them! Demultiplexing was great advice.

            It's the shorter two (~330 base amplicons, therefore ~170 bp overlap) that fail. Still having no luck tweaking these with the different parameters either.
            Last edited by JamieHeather; 07-16-2013, 10:21 AM.

            Comment

            • GenoMax
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2008
              • 7142

              #7
              There are a few additional tools posted that you could give a try: http://thegenomefactory.blogspot.com...aired-end.html

              Comment

              • JackieBadger
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2009
                • 385

                #8
                jamie ping me a mail...I'd like to discuss what you're up to [email protected]

                Comment

                • JamieHeather
                  @jamimmunology
                  • Nov 2012
                  • 96

                  #9
                  Cheers Genomax - I had tried a few of the others from that, particularly Cope and Pandaseq. Sadly Cope did worse than FLASH, and I'm not convinced Pandaseq installed correctly - it kept throwing up odd errors that the read IDs weren't identical, when they clearly were (even if I made the read names exactly the same, so both :1, or removing that whole block).

                  I'm just now trying to see how Cope works on the different demultiplexed files.

                  Comment

                  • JamieHeather
                    @jamimmunology
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 96

                    #10
                    In case anyone has a similar problem and finds this thread in the future, here's how it got solved.

                    Basically, as the reads are so long and the amplicons are so short, the end of each read goes past the start of the other read, so the 3' end of read has no equivalent in the other file. As this is what FLASH (and presumably the others) looks for, it doesn't find the huge overlap in the 5'.

                    It's easily solved - I just used FASTX-Toolkit to trim the reads down to a size where they will only overlap in their 3's, before running FLASH, e.g.:

                    Code:
                    fastx_trimmer -Q33 -f 1 -l 175 -i R1.fq -o shortR1.fq
                    fastx_trimmer -Q33 -f 1 -l 175 -i R2.fq -o shortR2.fq
                    flash shortR1.fq shortR2.fq
                    Works great!

                    Comment

                    • JackieBadger
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 385

                      #11
                      Now the 'fun' really begins for you!

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • SEQadmin2
                        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                        by SEQadmin2


                        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


                        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                        Yesterday, 07:11 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                        by SEQadmin2


                        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                        ...
                        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
                        by SEQadmin2


                        With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


                        Introduction

                        Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
                        05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                      0 responses
                      20 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                      0 responses
                      38 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
                      0 responses
                      44 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
                      0 responses
                      49 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...