Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wilson90
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 48

    cuffdiff uses bam file or Sam file

    Just wondering if cuffdiff uses Sam file or bam file as input.

    The reason for my post is because in my previous run, the output of cuffdiff says no differential expression is performed on my data. So I wonder if it is because I am providing bam instead of Sam as input.
  • wilson90
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 48

    #2
    This is what worries me.

    Code:
    > Processed 28454 loci.                        [*************************] 100%
    Performed 0 isoform-level transcription difference tests
    Performed 0 tss-level transcription difference tests
    Performed 0 gene-level transcription difference tests
    Performed 0 CDS-level transcription difference tests
    Performed 0 splicing tests
    Performed 0 promoter preference tests
    Performing 0 relative CDS output tests
    Writing isoform-level FPKM tracking
    Writing TSS group-level FPKM tracking
    Writing gene-level FPKM tracking
    Writing CDS-level FPKM tracking
    Writing isoform-level count tracking
    Writing TSS group-level count tracking
    Writing gene-level count tracking
    Writing CDS-level count tracking
    Writing isoform-level read group tracking
    Writing TSS group-level read group tracking
    Writing gene-level read group tracking
    Writing CDS-level read group tracking
    Writing read group info
    Writing run info
    Why no differential test is being performed?

    Comment

    • sindrle
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2013
      • 266

      #3
      Whats the code input?

      Comment

      • wilson90
        Member
        • May 2012
        • 48

        #4
        Code:
        cuffdiff -o bam_noslash -b $GENOME -p 35 -L G1,G2 -N -u merged_asm/merged.gtf $BAM1,$BAM2,$BAM3,$BAM4,$BAM5,$BAM6,$BAM7,$BAM8,$BAM9,$BAM10 $BAM11,$BAM12,$BAM13,$BAM14,$BAM15,$BAM16,$BAM17,$BAM18,$BAM19
        ,$BAM20

        Comment

        • wilson90
          Member
          • May 2012
          • 48

          #5
          Would it be because:
          1. Annotation issue?
          2. I remove duplicative reads using picard?
          3. Library issue ( among biological replicates)?
          4. I have performed upper-quartile normalization in Cufflinks, does it affect?

          Thank you.

          Comment

          • wilson90
            Member
            • May 2012
            • 48

            #6
            for more info:
            Code:
            ##Trimming Low Qual reads and Bases with low quality
            java -jar Trimmomatic-0.30/trimmomatic-0.30.jar PE -phred33 read_1.fq read_2.fq output_forward_paired.fq.gz output_forward_unpaired.fq.gz output_reverse_paired.fq.gz output_reve
            rse_unpaired.fq.gz LEADING:28 TRAILING:28 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15 MINLEN:50
            
            
            
            ##Checking Quality
            gunzip output_forward_paired.fq.gz
            gunzip output_reverse_paired.fq.gz
            fastqc --extract -f fastq output_forward_paired.fq output_reverse_paired.fq
            
            
            ##Running Tophat for mapping
            tophat2 -p 35 bowtie2/mm9 output_forward_paired.fq output_reverse_paired.fq 
            
            
            ##Running removal of PCR duplicates.
            cd tophat_out
            PICARD=/picard-tools-1.91/MarkDuplicates.jar
            BAM=accepted_hits.bam
            java -jar $PICARD INPUT=$BAM OUTPUT=nodup.bam METRICS_FILE=dup.txt VALIDATION_STRINGENCY=LENIENT REMOVE_DUPLICATES=true TMP_DIR=/tmp
            
            
            ##Running cufflinks to quantify transcript without transcript discovery
            mkdir cuff_no_novel
            cd cuff_no_novel
            BAM=../nodup.bam
            cufflinks --num-threads 35 --quiet --no-update-check --frag-bias-correct --multi-read-correct  --upper-quartile-norm -G gtf/mm9_annotation.gtf -b bowtie2_path/base/mm9.fa $BAM

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            12 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            15 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            54 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...