Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • woa
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 13

    #1

    Exonerate protein2dna:bestfit problem

    Hello I'm having a problem to run the "protein2dna:bestfit" model in my 64 bit computer and under both Linux Cluster and Cygwin.
    For the Linux Cluster I've tried both the readymade executable and compiled code.

    The program just quits without producing any output.

    However it runs fine with my old 32 bit Ubuntu.

    Did anybody face the same problem and any suggestions to solve it?

    I'm approaching a deadline fast, so any help is much appreciated

    Thanks in advance
    Last edited by woa; 08-26-2013, 08:15 AM.
  • SES
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 275

    #2
    You may not be using the appropriate settings for your data. Did you get an alignments when you use the basic protein2dna model (without the 'bestfit')?

    Comment

    • woa
      Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 13

      #3
      Hello SES, Thanks for your answer. Yes, I'm getting perfect alignment when using just 'protein2dna' without the bestfit option.

      Some details on the version, the command I used and input/output:

      exonerate from exonerate version 2.2.0
      Using glib version 2.22.5
      Built on Aug 26 2013


      The simple command I used :

      Code:
      ./exonerate -m p2d:b -q test_protein.fasta -t test_dna.fasta --exhaustive yes
      The program just quits without producing any output as follows:

      Code:
      ** (process:1922): WARNING **: Exhaustively generating suboptimal alignments will be VERY SLOW
      -- completed exonerate analysis
      The Pastebin single Protein and DNA file links are here:

      Pastebin.com is the number one paste tool since 2002. Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time.


      Pastebin.com is the number one paste tool since 2002. Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time.


      Thanks

      Comment

      • woa
        Member
        • Mar 2011
        • 13

        #4
        Also note that I used both the readymade executable version and also compiled it on my own machine. I've used two sources for compilation. From the Ensemble CVS and also the tarball available from EBI.

        Comment

        • SES
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 275

          #5
          In that case, I would just use the results you have with the basic protein2dna model. Is there a reason you think the bestfit model needs to be used? Note that with bestfit the entire protein must match (IIRC), and it could be that this is not possible with your data, so you get no alignments (when specifying the bestfit model).

          Comment

          • woa
            Member
            • Mar 2011
            • 13

            #6
            I've used the same sequences in my 32 Bit Ubuntu to get proten2dna:bestfit alignment. The bestfit alignment is longer than the non-bestfit(as expected, as it aligned the whole length) of protein. I would like to get a global alignment to the protein, thats why I'm using it. If I could tweak some parameters for non-bestfit, so that the alignment is global-ish and close to bestfit then thats fine too. But i'm not sure which parameters( like gap-penalties may be) to tweak and to what extent.

            Comment

            • SES
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2010
              • 275

              #7
              There is also the affine:global model, for doing global alignments. Though, I'm not sure you can do protein-dna alignments with that model. It sounds like you got the protein2dna:bestfit working now? If not, I think you can just specify that you want exonerate to do exhaustive alignments and it will find the best possible.

              Comment

              • woa
                Member
                • Mar 2011
                • 13

                #8
                No, protein2dna:bestfit is still not working

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • kinpict.com
                  Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                  by kinpict.com
                  The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
                  Today, 06:37 PM
                • SEQadmin2
                  16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                  by SEQadmin2





                  NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
                  10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
                0 responses
                28 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
                0 responses
                35 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
                2 responses
                56 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post kinpict.com  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
                0 responses
                175 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...