Originally posted by vpi
View Post
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Well the output from "blastn -version" sort of disputes that statement doesn't it? Could someone else have installed 2.2.27?
-
-
I never installed 2.2.27+ at all. The first time I installed is BLAST 2.2.28+.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Did you install 2.2.28+ properly after downloading? Did you remove 2.2.27+? Or are both versions installed and is 2.2.27+ taking precedence based on their order in your $PATH environment variable?Originally posted by vpi View Post-outfmt '6 std stitle' gives the same output as -outfmt 6
I downloaded this latest version for linux ncbi-blast-2.2.28+-x64-linux.tar.gz. But when I run the command blastn -version, it says BLAST 2.2.27+. This might be the problem. What might be wrong?
Leave a comment:
-
-
-outfmt '6 std stitle' gives the same output as -outfmt 6
I downloaded this latest version for linux ncbi-blast-2.2.28+-x64-linux.tar.gz. But when I run the command blastn -version, it says BLAST 2.2.27+. This might be the problem. What might be wrong?
Leave a comment:
-
-
This bit of information ties directly to maubp's question. Which version are you using? Run this command to find out.Originally posted by vpi View PostHi,
I tried to look at the available -outfmt options using blastn -help and I cant find stitle or salltitle options.
Please help!
The stitle & salltitle outfmt options were only added in the latest version, 2.2.28 (released April 2013). If you don't see them listed in the help message then it is a good guess that you don't really have the latest version.Code:# blastn -version
Leave a comment:
-
-
You said 'latest', but which version of BLAST+ exactly are you using?
Leave a comment:
-
-
What about -outfmt '6 std stitle' or -outfmt '6 std salltitles'. Perhaps refseq entries simply don't have subject titles? How did you create your refseq? Did you download it from ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/db/ and simply tar zxvf?Last edited by rhinoceros; 10-18-2013, 02:54 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Even without -num_alignments I get the same results. But earlier I tried num_alignments 1 -outfmt 6 and it worked.
NODE_1_length_10131_cov_55.7043_ID_695104 gi|296556485|gb|M19921.2|HIVNL43 100.00 822 0 0 6686 7507 12281 11460 0.0 1519
NODE_2_length_3299_cov_8.97446_ID_698840 gi|109255272|ref|NC_008168.1| 92.63 95 2 3 957 1051 25902 25991 2e-27 132
NODE_3_length_2648_cov_1.88378_ID_694314 gi|237784637|ref|NC_012704.1| 82.29 2688 371 89 1 2648 114906 117528 0.0 2230
NODE_4_length_1757_cov_30.9221_ID_695832 gi|154149549|ref|NC_009712.1| 78.86 175 33 4 490 663 2250989 2251160 1e-22 115
NODE_6_length_1496_cov_25.8736_ID_702132 gi|304313778|ref|NC_014408.1| 76.42 246 45 9 666 903 324067 324307 2e-24 121
NODE_7_length_1489_cov_0.428047_ID_692868 gi|170745058|ref|NC_010510.1| 95.06 1337 47 14 1 1325 547100 545771 0.0 2085
If the path for refseq was not correct then the blast wouldn't run. Isnt it like that? Anyways I get the same result with full path as well (just query).
Leave a comment:
-
-
-num_alignments is not a valid flag for outfmt 6Originally posted by vpi View PostHi,
Here are the commands I used and the first five lines of the output,
blastn -query /home/viraja/Desktop/samples_with_no_flags/sample_01/contigs_01_without_flag.fasta -db refseq -num_alignments 1 -outfmt '6 qseqid stitle'
NODE_1_length_10131_cov_55.7043_ID_695104
NODE_2_length_3299_cov_8.97446_ID_698840
NODE_3_length_2648_cov_1.88378_ID_694314
NODE_4_length_1757_cov_30.9221_ID_695832
NODE_6_length_1496_cov_25.8736_ID_702132
Also, are you sure you have setup refseq properly? Try with using full path to it..
Leave a comment:
-
-
Hi,
Here are the commands I used and the first five lines of the output,
blastn -query /home/viraja/Desktop/samples_with_no_flags/sample_01/contigs_01_without_flag.fasta -db refseq -num_alignments 1 -outfmt '6 qseqid stitle'
NODE_1_length_10131_cov_55.7043_ID_695104
NODE_2_length_3299_cov_8.97446_ID_698840
NODE_3_length_2648_cov_1.88378_ID_694314
NODE_4_length_1757_cov_30.9221_ID_695832
NODE_6_length_1496_cov_25.8736_ID_702132
Leave a comment:
-
-
I used -outfmt "6 qacc sacc stitle score length mismatch gaps evalue qlen slen qstart qend sstart send" and in the third column I got the subject title. stitle is the correct option. Can you show the first five lines of the output file ?
Leave a comment:
-
-
Missing format options in standalone BLAST
Hi,
I am using latest version of standalone BLAST on linux. I tried to use custom output format and few options are missing. For example, I want to print the title of the subject along with the query, so I say
-outfmt '6 qseqid stitle'
With the above command I just get a list of queries. I tried to look at the available -outfmt options using blastn -help and I cant find stitle or salltitle options.
Please help!Tags: None
-
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.
The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
...-
Channel: Articles
06-02-2026, 10:05 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.
Introduction
Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...-
Channel: Articles
05-22-2026, 06:42 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:09 AM
|
0 responses
9 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Today, 10:09 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 08:59 AM
|
0 responses
16 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Yesterday, 08:59 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
|
0 responses
24 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
|
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
|
Leave a comment: