Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KlChen
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 3

    Parallelization for Bismark using Bowtie 1

    For Bowtie 1, I can use the -p option to do parallel search, but when I run Bismark with Bowtie 1 and the option -p 7, output is

    "The parallelization switch '-p' only works for Bowtie 2. Please respecify! at bismark/bismark_v0.9.0/bismark line 6497

    What's wrong with -p and Bismark? How can I speed up my alignment with Bowtie 1? Shall I use Bowtie 2 instead?
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Nothing is wrong with Bismark. When you run bowtie1 using multiple threads, you can't guarantee what order the reads will be returned in. Since Bismark runs multiple instances of bowtie at once and then processes their outputs, it needs the reads to be in the same order (otherwise, you end up comparing different reads and everything breaks down). In bowtie2, this can be enforced with --reorder, but no such option exists in bowtie1. Just use bowtie2.

    Comment

    • KlChen
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2013
      • 3

      #3
      Thank you very much!

      Originally posted by dpryan View Post
      Nothing is wrong with Bismark. When you run bowtie1 using multiple threads, you can't guarantee what order the reads will be returned in. Since Bismark runs multiple instances of bowtie at once and then processes their outputs, it needs the reads to be in the same order (otherwise, you end up comparing different reads and everything breaks down). In bowtie2, this can be enforced with --reorder, but no such option exists in bowtie1. Just use bowtie2.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
      0 responses
      34 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
      0 responses
      45 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
      0 responses
      24 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...