Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rosales
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 2

    #1

    Errors: Mapped mate should have mate reference name and MAPQ should be 0 for unmappe

    Hi,

    I want to convert my bam file (from tophat) to a fasta file. First, I used samtools view to convert sam to bam and then I used picard's SamToFastq to convert to fastq, but I received the following error:

    Exception in thread "main" net.sf.samtools.SAMFormatException: Error parsing text SAM file. MAPQ must be zero if RNAME is not specified; Line 1
    Line: DB775P1:275:C27JRACXX:1:2307:16302:100526 133 * 0 255 * * 0 0 CGGAAACCTTGTTACGACTTTTACTTCCTCTAGATAGTCAAGTTCGACCGTCTTCTCAGCGCTCCGCCAGGGCCGTGGGCCGACCCCGGCGGGGCCGATCC CCCFFFFFHHHHHJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJIJJJJJJIJJJJJJJJJJJIJJHHFFFDDDDDDDDDDDDDCDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD?


    Here is the command I ran:
    java -jar picard-tools-1.103/SamToFastq.jar INPUT=unmapped1.sam FASTQ=tophat_1914_unmapped_R1.fq SECOND_END_FASTQ=tophat_1914_unmapped_R2.fq


    Also I used Picards ValidateSamFile program to check my samfile and the output is as follows:
    ERROR: Record 1, Read name DB775P1:275:C27JRACXX:1:1101:1661:1847, Mapped mate should have mate reference name
    ERROR: Record 1, Read name DB775P1:275:C27JRACXX:1:1101:1661:1847, MAPQ should be 0 for unmapped read.

    Does anyone know how to fix this problem or another way to convert bam to fastq or fasta.

    I used the below command to convert bam to fasta, but it looks like I loose the pair-end data information.
    samtools view unmapped.bam | awk '{OFS="\t"; print ">"$1"\n"$10}' - > unmapped.fasta

    So I need something that takes into consideration that I have pair-end data.

    Thanks
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    Well, Picard is complaining because your .bam is weird. There's no indication of what the mate is named, and there's no information about how it aligned in the binary flag either. That's weird.

    You could try running Picard with VALIDATION_STRINGENCY=LENIENT, but maybe you should figure out why your .bams are so weird. Maybe the mate got trimmed away by some kind of QC? In which case, the remaining read should have been treated like a single end read, not a paired one.

    Comment

    • rosales
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2013
      • 2

      #3
      Using VALIDATION_STRINGENCY=LENIENT did the trick. I was able to convert sam to fastq.
      THANKS!!!!!!!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      30 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      39 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      45 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...