Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rajj
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2013
    • 4

    Samtools output errors (ref is all 'N' in vcf)

    I am working on using bowtie and samtools to take a fastq file, map to HG19 using bowtie, and use samtools to find SNPs and output a VCF file.

    I am able to get decent .vcf output, but the vcf file created has all 'N's for ref. Is there an easy fix?

    I am using the commands:

    bowtie -S humanref " + patfile + " > bw_out
    samtools view -S -u bw_out > bw_bam
    samtools sort bw_bam bw_bamsort
    samtools mpileup -u -D bw_bamsort.bam > bcf_out
    bcftools view bcf_out > vcf_out

    Thanks!
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    You didn't tell mpileup what the reference was.

    use -f to tell it what your reference is. It will make the reference index file if it doesn't exist.

    Comment

    • rajj
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2013
      • 4

      #3
      Thank you for the quick response.

      I have multiple reference files. How do I call all 22 of them?

      Comment

      • vivek_
        PhD Student
        • Jul 2012
        • 164

        #4
        If you are mentioning 22 different chromosomes, you should concatenate them together and present as a single fasta file for samtools.

        Comment

        • rajj
          Junior Member
          • Dec 2013
          • 4

          #5
          OK that worked great!

          One last question, when I am using mpileup, my vcf file only has information for chromosome 1 to 19. The last chromosomes are not included. Is this due to a maximum depth error, or maybe memory? And how do I fix this?

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...