Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mmmm
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 131

    #1

    coverageBed -abam

    need your advice please-
    when I am using bedtools to locate missing genes from my assembled strain compared to the reference genome, I got (0) values for all genes although I am very sure that my strain is very similar to the reference strain- I am not sure what could be wrong

    coverageBed -abam input.sorted.bam -b reference.gff3.txt > output.coverage.txt

    (I obtained the gff file from ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/ genomes and saved it as tad delimited
  • larsgt
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 6

    #2
    Could you have a problem similar to this?

    Comment

    • mmmm
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2013
      • 131

      #3
      any other suggestions please for this issue

      Comment

      • larsgt
        Junior Member
        • Jun 2012
        • 6

        #4
        If you include the a short example of the two files it might enable a better chance of identifying the problem. I don't know if coverageBam only wants bed files or if it's ok with gff. Also check that the line breaks in the file are correct for your platform or make a small test example you know should work.

        Comment

        • mmmm
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2013
          • 131

          #5
          gff annotation file

          in general, where do we get gff file from?, or woulf it be better to annotate the reference genome using RAST for example

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • kinpict.com
            Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by kinpict.com
            The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
            Today, 06:37 PM
          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2





            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
            10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
          0 responses
          26 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
          2 responses
          56 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post kinpict.com  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          175 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...