Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mmmm
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 131

    coverageBed -abam

    need your advice please-
    when I am using bedtools to locate missing genes from my assembled strain compared to the reference genome, I got (0) values for all genes although I am very sure that my strain is very similar to the reference strain- I am not sure what could be wrong

    coverageBed -abam input.sorted.bam -b reference.gff3.txt > output.coverage.txt

    (I obtained the gff file from ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/ genomes and saved it as tad delimited
  • larsgt
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 6

    #2
    Could you have a problem similar to this?

    Comment

    • mmmm
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2013
      • 131

      #3
      any other suggestions please for this issue

      Comment

      • larsgt
        Junior Member
        • Jun 2012
        • 6

        #4
        If you include the a short example of the two files it might enable a better chance of identifying the problem. I don't know if coverageBam only wants bed files or if it's ok with gff. Also check that the line breaks in the file are correct for your platform or make a small test example you know should work.

        Comment

        • mmmm
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2013
          • 131

          #5
          gff annotation file

          in general, where do we get gff file from?, or woulf it be better to annotate the reference genome using RAST for example

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...