Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • foolishbrat
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 45

    #1

    How to measure miRNA expression from Illumina libraries

    I have a 51 single-end reads generated with MiSeq using NEBNext Multiplex Oligos for Illumina.

    The data is obtained from from blood serum miRNA.

    The sample sheet looks like this:

    Code:
    IEMFileVersion,4
    Investigator Name,FB
    Experiment Name,WT10104
    Date,11/27/2013
    Workflow,GenerateFASTQ
    Application,FASTQ Only
    Assay,TruSeq Small RNA
    Description,
    Chemistry,Default
    
    [Reads]
    51
    
    [Settings]
    ReverseComplement,0
    
    [Data]
    Sample_ID,Sample_Name,Sample_Plate,Sample_Well,I7_Index_ID,index,Sample_Project,Description
    HS130333-1,,,,RPI3,TTAGGC,,
    HS130333-2,,,,RPI4,TGACCA,,
    HS130333-3,,,,RPI5,ACAGTG,,
    So it contain 3 files:
    Code:
    HS130333-1.fastq
    HS130333-2.fastq
    HS130333-3.fastq
    My question is, if I want to measure the miRNA expression,
    should I combine all the 3 files above, then map them before computing the expression?

    OR map each of the above 3 files individually and then average the expression?
  • TiborNagy
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 329

    #2
    I suggest you to map individually, because you get more statistical power for further analysis.

    Comment

    • RedLightPanic
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2013
      • 9

      #3
      Hi foolishbrat,

      I agree with TiborNagy that the best option is to map them individually and the compute the miRNA expression separately.

      On the other hand, I also suggest you to apply some type of normalization before going further on the analysis of miRNA expression. Here) you'll find a survey of normalization methods for small RNA-Seq data.

      Hope this helps

      Comment

      • foolishbrat
        Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 45

        #4
        Thanks a million both.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • kinpict.com
          Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by kinpict.com
          The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
          Today, 06:37 PM
        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2





          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
        0 responses
        28 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
        2 responses
        56 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post kinpict.com  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        175 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...