Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMPERATOR
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 9

    Paired End Reads file formatting question

    Hello all,

    I have a quick question about the format of the fastq files for paired end reads.

    For each sample I have a R1 and R2 file. Should I concatenate the files to do the mapping?

    If it is optional, what would the advantages of one file be?

    Thanks for your time!!!~~~!!!
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    No, keep them separate. You will normally feed the aligner both files at once. One of the points of paired-end sequencing is that you can use one read to aid in the mapping of the other.

    Comment

    • IMPERATOR
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2014
      • 9

      #3
      Originally posted by dpryan View Post
      No, keep them separate. You will normally feed the aligner both files at once. One of the points of paired-end sequencing is that you can use one read to aid in the mapping of the other.


      Thanks!

      Quick follow up, someone told me to merge is .bam files for each paired read before I perform mpileup.

      Is this kosher?

      Tusen Takk

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Read the manuals for the aligners/samtools before asking this kind of questions

        Comment

        • dpryan
          Devon Ryan
          • Jul 2011
          • 3478

          #5
          That would be a VERY unusual thing to do unless you have a very good reason to do so. My knee-jerk reaction would be to tell you to simply ignore anything that person ever says, but perhaps you're doing a non-standard experiment.

          Comment

          • swbarnes2
            Senior Member
            • May 2008
            • 910

            #6
            Originally posted by IMPERATOR View Post


            Thanks!

            Quick follow up, someone told me to merge is .bam files for each paired read before I perform mpileup.

            Is this kosher?

            Tusen Takk
            Merging two bams that really are the same sample is usually a good idea, but you have paired end data. You don't want to treat it like two separate single end files. Read the manuals for bwa or bowtie, or whatever you are using, and do what it says for paired end data. You won't have to merge the .bams, the software will do that for you when you give it paired end data.

            Comment

            • IMPERATOR
              Junior Member
              • Jan 2014
              • 9

              #7
              Originally posted by swbarnes2 View Post
              Merging two bams that really are the same sample is usually a good idea, but you have paired end data. You don't want to treat it like two separate single end files. Read the manuals for bwa or bowtie, or whatever you are using, and do what it says for paired end data. You won't have to merge the .bams, the software will do that for you when you give it paired end data.
              ~THANKS~

              I was actually reading up on bowtie before working on it and I should give it my paired end reads

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                by SEQadmin2



                Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
              0 responses
              13 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
              0 responses
              25 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
              0 responses
              16 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
              0 responses
              33 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...