Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMPERATOR
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 9

    #1

    Paired End Reads file formatting question

    Hello all,

    I have a quick question about the format of the fastq files for paired end reads.

    For each sample I have a R1 and R2 file. Should I concatenate the files to do the mapping?

    If it is optional, what would the advantages of one file be?

    Thanks for your time!!!~~~!!!
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    No, keep them separate. You will normally feed the aligner both files at once. One of the points of paired-end sequencing is that you can use one read to aid in the mapping of the other.

    Comment

    • IMPERATOR
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2014
      • 9

      #3
      Originally posted by dpryan View Post
      No, keep them separate. You will normally feed the aligner both files at once. One of the points of paired-end sequencing is that you can use one read to aid in the mapping of the other.


      Thanks!

      Quick follow up, someone told me to merge is .bam files for each paired read before I perform mpileup.

      Is this kosher?

      Tusen Takk

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Read the manuals for the aligners/samtools before asking this kind of questions

        Comment

        • dpryan
          Devon Ryan
          • Jul 2011
          • 3478

          #5
          That would be a VERY unusual thing to do unless you have a very good reason to do so. My knee-jerk reaction would be to tell you to simply ignore anything that person ever says, but perhaps you're doing a non-standard experiment.

          Comment

          • swbarnes2
            Senior Member
            • May 2008
            • 910

            #6
            Originally posted by IMPERATOR View Post


            Thanks!

            Quick follow up, someone told me to merge is .bam files for each paired read before I perform mpileup.

            Is this kosher?

            Tusen Takk
            Merging two bams that really are the same sample is usually a good idea, but you have paired end data. You don't want to treat it like two separate single end files. Read the manuals for bwa or bowtie, or whatever you are using, and do what it says for paired end data. You won't have to merge the .bams, the software will do that for you when you give it paired end data.

            Comment

            • IMPERATOR
              Junior Member
              • Jan 2014
              • 9

              #7
              Originally posted by swbarnes2 View Post
              Merging two bams that really are the same sample is usually a good idea, but you have paired end data. You don't want to treat it like two separate single end files. Read the manuals for bwa or bowtie, or whatever you are using, and do what it says for paired end data. You won't have to merge the .bams, the software will do that for you when you give it paired end data.
              ~THANKS~

              I was actually reading up on bowtie before working on it and I should give it my paired end reads

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              16 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              17 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              35 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              42 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...