Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • reema
    Member
    • Feb 2014
    • 27

    #1

    FastQC Qualty Control Calculation

    Dear All,

    I would like to known how quality score is calculated in FastQC for "per base sequence Quality" plot.


    Thanks,
    Reema Singh
  • blakeoft
    Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 79

    #2
    The "Help > Contents... > Analysis Modules > Per Base Sequence Quality" section should answer your question. This plot gives a lot of different kinds of statistical data including mean (blue line), inter-quartile range (yellow boxes) and median (red line).

    Comment

    • simonandrews
      Simon Andrews
      • May 2009
      • 870

      #3
      The quality scores themselves aren't calculated by FastQC - they're taken directly from the fastq files and are added by the base calling software of the sequencing platform. They're basically a measure of the signal to noise for each base call. The exact implementation will vary depending on the sequencing platform (and they normally don't tell you exactly how it's done). If you want to know more about the meaning of the scores you can look at the quality section of the wikipedia fastq article which describes this pretty well.

      Comment

      • reema
        Member
        • Feb 2014
        • 27

        #4
        Hello Simon and blakeoft

        Thanks, It helps.

        Regards
        Reema Singh

        Comment

        • reema
          Member
          • Feb 2014
          • 27

          #5
          Trinity-Duplicate removal

          Dear All,

          I am using trinity for transcriptomics assembly. I have few queries:-

          1) have two condition(Control and Treated) and each condition has 4 replicates. so if I merge these .fq files together, how the generated assembly from this merged .fq file would be better than the assembly generated from single(using only one replicate) sample?

          2) Do I need to remove duplicates from individual fastq file before merging or after merging them together?

          3) I saw there is a script "fasta_remove_duplicates" in the trinity folder. So is there any chance that "In-silico-normalization" in trinity take care of these duplicate reads?

          I would appreciate any explanations.

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            Originally posted by reema View Post
            Dear All,

            I am using trinity for transcriptomics assembly. I have few queries:-

            1) have two condition(Control and Treated) and each condition has 4 replicates. so if I merge these .fq files together, how the generated assembly from this merged .fq file would be better than the assembly generated from single(using only one replicate) sample?

            2) Do I need to remove duplicates from individual fastq file before merging or after merging them together?

            3) I saw there is a script "fasta_remove_duplicates" in the trinity folder. So is there any chance that "In-silico-normalization" in trinity take care of these duplicate reads?

            I would appreciate any explanations.
            Reema: Consider moving this to a new thread since it is not related to your original query. Many people are not going to see this question otherwise.

            Comment

            • reema
              Member
              • Feb 2014
              • 27

              #7
              Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
              Reema: Consider moving this to a new thread since it is not related to your original query. Many people are not going to see this question otherwise.
              Thanks,

              Now I posted as a new thread.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                Today, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              10 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:56 AM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
              0 responses
              25 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 09-29-2026, 09:51 AM
              0 responses
              77 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...