Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • priya
    Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 57

    #1

    Microarray Signal Intensity values Published data

    Hi,
    I have one question regarding microarrays,I was checking Published data, and they published signal intensity values for Affymetrix Probe Ids
    NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) is a public archive and resource for gene expression data.

    NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) is a public archive and resource for gene expression data.

    I wanted to check the expression of certain genes in that dataset, so I annotated the Affy_Ids to Gene names

    Eg:
    File Affy_Id Sig.Intensity Gene Species Description
    NEB_RA_rep1_annotate.txt: 1428888_at 130.05 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep1_annotate.txt: 1436028_at 469.84 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep2_annotate.txt: 1428888_at 104.99 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep2_annotate.txt: 1436028_at 420.72 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep3_annotate.txt: 1428888_at 67.26 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep3_annotate.txt: 1436028_at 290 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33


    I see that for each condition, there are two Affy_Ids annotating to the same gene , with different intensity values. Its confusing to judge the intensity value for a gene in particular condition..
    Any suggestions??
  • mastal
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 666

    #2
    Not many genes have more than 1 probeset mapping to them.

    In the cases where there is more than 1 probeset mapping to the gene,
    it could be that there was evidence for alternative splicing when the array was designed, and the different probesets may represent different transcripts.

    Have a look at the Affymetrix web site, at the NetAffx analysis center, and the UCSC browser for more information.

    Comment

    • priya
      Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 57

      #3
      Originally posted by mastal View Post
      Not many genes have more than 1 probeset mapping to them.

      In the cases where there is more than 1 probeset mapping to the gene,
      it could be that there was evidence for alternative splicing when the array was designed, and the different probesets may represent different transcripts.

      Have a look at the Affymetrix web site, at the NetAffx analysis center, and the UCSC browser for more information.
      There are other cases of genes where this kind of situation I can see.. But if thats the case of different transcripts.. seems like it wont give easy solution when we want to eye-pick the genes based on signal intensities and judge for the expression??

      Comment

      • mastal
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 666

        #4
        No, it's not easy for those type of cases.

        Where did you get the probe annotations from?

        Comment

        • priya
          Member
          • Apr 2013
          • 57

          #5
          Originally posted by mastal View Post
          No, it's not easy for those type of cases.

          Where did you get the probe annotations from?
          I used DAVID gene_Id conversion tool to annotate affy_Id to gene_names

          Comment

          • jeni
            Member
            • Oct 2014
            • 17

            #6
            Signal Intensity?

            Hello

            Does the signal intensity value (Affy data) is the related with the expression value of genes? Also, I am curious to know if these value is comparable between different probe from 1 dataset and will help to conclude gene1 is expressed higher than gene2 ?

            Thanks in advance.
            Last edited by jeni; 10-27-2014, 08:08 AM.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
              by SEQadmin2



              CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

              Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
              ...
              Yesterday, 11:01 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 02:55 AM
            0 responses
            12 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
            0 responses
            12 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
            0 responses
            13 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...