Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • priya
    Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 57

    #1

    Microarray Signal Intensity values Published data

    Hi,
    I have one question regarding microarrays,I was checking Published data, and they published signal intensity values for Affymetrix Probe Ids


    I wanted to check the expression of certain genes in that dataset, so I annotated the Affy_Ids to Gene names

    Eg:
    File Affy_Id Sig.Intensity Gene Species Description
    NEB_RA_rep1_annotate.txt: 1428888_at 130.05 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep1_annotate.txt: 1436028_at 469.84 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep2_annotate.txt: 1428888_at 104.99 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep2_annotate.txt: 1436028_at 420.72 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep3_annotate.txt: 1428888_at 67.26 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33
    NEB_RA_rep3_annotate.txt: 1436028_at 290 tmem33 Mus musculus transmembrane protein 33


    I see that for each condition, there are two Affy_Ids annotating to the same gene , with different intensity values. Its confusing to judge the intensity value for a gene in particular condition..
    Any suggestions??
  • mastal
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 666

    #2
    Not many genes have more than 1 probeset mapping to them.

    In the cases where there is more than 1 probeset mapping to the gene,
    it could be that there was evidence for alternative splicing when the array was designed, and the different probesets may represent different transcripts.

    Have a look at the Affymetrix web site, at the NetAffx analysis center, and the UCSC browser for more information.

    Comment

    • priya
      Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 57

      #3
      Originally posted by mastal View Post
      Not many genes have more than 1 probeset mapping to them.

      In the cases where there is more than 1 probeset mapping to the gene,
      it could be that there was evidence for alternative splicing when the array was designed, and the different probesets may represent different transcripts.

      Have a look at the Affymetrix web site, at the NetAffx analysis center, and the UCSC browser for more information.
      There are other cases of genes where this kind of situation I can see.. But if thats the case of different transcripts.. seems like it wont give easy solution when we want to eye-pick the genes based on signal intensities and judge for the expression??

      Comment

      • mastal
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 666

        #4
        No, it's not easy for those type of cases.

        Where did you get the probe annotations from?

        Comment

        • priya
          Member
          • Apr 2013
          • 57

          #5
          Originally posted by mastal View Post
          No, it's not easy for those type of cases.

          Where did you get the probe annotations from?
          I used DAVID gene_Id conversion tool to annotate affy_Id to gene_names

          Comment

          • jeni
            Member
            • Oct 2014
            • 17

            #6
            Signal Intensity?

            Hello

            Does the signal intensity value (Affy data) is the related with the expression value of genes? Also, I am curious to know if these value is comparable between different probe from 1 dataset and will help to conclude gene1 is expressed higher than gene2 ?

            Thanks in advance.
            Last edited by jeni; 10-27-2014, 08:08 AM.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
            0 responses
            28 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...