I'm trying lastz-1.03.73 from here: http://www.bx.psu.edu/~rsharris/lastz/newer/
But I don't see lastz_32... Is this now the default behaviour?
I just tried 'make lastz_32' and it appeared :-D
Thanks,
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
sorry, my late thread..Originally posted by Bob-Harris View PostThe short answer is you need to use lastz_32 instead of lastz.
The long answer… the default lastz build can only handle a target up to 2Gbp combined length. This was a conscious design choice (circa 2004), as there is some efficiency gain from limiting the variables that track sequence positions to 31 bits. The lastz_32 build relaxes that constraint so that it can handle a target up to 4Gbp combined length.
The efficiency gain was more important on machines 10 years ago than it is now, but for backward compatibility I am keeping that as the default behavior. I'll (probably) change this error report on future releases so that it tells the user to consider using lastz_32.
The issue is discussed in the readme file here:
Bob H
(lastz author)
I solve the problem with upper.
Thanks!
Leave a comment:
-
The short answer is you need to use lastz_32 instead of lastz.Originally posted by Hyunmin View PostThis is my lastz command
$ lastz hg19/chrAll.fa[multiple] merged.fsa
FAILURE: in load_fasta_sequence for hg19/chrAll.fa, sequence length 2,084,766,314+115,169,878 exceeds maximum (2,147,483,637)
The long answer… the default lastz build can only handle a target up to 2Gbp combined length. This was a conscious design choice (circa 2004), as there is some efficiency gain from limiting the variables that track sequence positions to 31 bits. The lastz_32 build relaxes that constraint so that it can handle a target up to 4Gbp combined length.
The efficiency gain was more important on machines 10 years ago than it is now, but for backward compatibility I am keeping that as the default behavior. I'll (probably) change this error report on future releases so that it tells the user to consider using lastz_32.
The issue is discussed in the readme file here:
Bob H
(lastz author)
Leave a comment:
-
Have you tried to do the comparison choosing a smaller set of chromosomes from hg19 at a time and checking if that works?
Leave a comment:
-
Using lastz (FAILURE: in load_fasta_sequence)
This is my lastz command
$ lastz hg19/chrAll.fa[multiple] merged.fsa
Error
FAILURE: in load_fasta_sequence for hg19/chrAll.fa, sequence length 2,084,766,314+115,169,878 exceeds maximum (2,147,483,637)
I got the error in above.
What's wrong thing?
Thanks,
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).
Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into...-
Channel: Articles
07-31-2026, 11:01 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-24-2026, 10:32 AM
|
0 responses
9 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-24-2026, 10:32 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-20-2026, 11:17 AM
|
0 responses
30 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-20-2026, 11:17 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-18-2026, 10:05 AM
|
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-18-2026, 10:05 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
|
0 responses
45 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
|
Leave a comment: