Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ppm
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 3

    #1

    RPKM vs Fold Change

    Hi,

    I have been trying to make TSS plots. I see that the RPKM values for both the input and enriched ChIPseq samples are close while when I plot them for fold change, the global enrichment in one of the samples around TSS is more than the other. Also, I have two different cell lines, therefore, two different inputs as well.

    THank you,
  • ppm
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 3

    #2
    Would anyone know what could be the reason for this?

    Comment

    • dpryan
      Devon Ryan
      • Jul 2011
      • 3478

      #3
      My guess would be that it has something to do with how you're calculating RPKM. Is the "M" from the total mapped reads or just the total mapped reads in the regions that you're looking at?

      Comment

      • jparsons
        Member
        • Feb 2012
        • 62

        #4
        Why are you using RPKM here?

        I'm not too familiar with your study, but I'd think that you want to be looking at windows of very specific width (around the TSSs, +/- N nt) and therefore will be comparing sequences of identical length. No need to length normalize when everything is the same length.

        Comment

        • ppm
          Junior Member
          • Mar 2014
          • 3

          #5
          So, I have ChIPseq data for two cell-lines, therefore, two inputs.

          I am plotting TSS plots +/-1500 bp. I am using ngsplot to do this.

          When I just use enriched bam file or total input bam file, it gives me RPKM plotted on the Y-axis. These look very similar in case of both the cell lines.

          Next, when I plot enrichedvstotalInput for these cell lines. I see that one of the cell line is more enriched than the other. I am not sure why would this happen. Views will be much appreciated.

          Thanks

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • kinpict.com
            Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by kinpict.com
            The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
            Today, 06:37 PM
          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2





            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
            10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
          2 responses
          56 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post kinpict.com  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          175 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...