Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ppm
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 3

    #1

    RPKM vs Fold Change

    Hi,

    I have been trying to make TSS plots. I see that the RPKM values for both the input and enriched ChIPseq samples are close while when I plot them for fold change, the global enrichment in one of the samples around TSS is more than the other. Also, I have two different cell lines, therefore, two different inputs as well.

    THank you,
  • ppm
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 3

    #2
    Would anyone know what could be the reason for this?

    Comment

    • dpryan
      Devon Ryan
      • Jul 2011
      • 3478

      #3
      My guess would be that it has something to do with how you're calculating RPKM. Is the "M" from the total mapped reads or just the total mapped reads in the regions that you're looking at?

      Comment

      • jparsons
        Member
        • Feb 2012
        • 62

        #4
        Why are you using RPKM here?

        I'm not too familiar with your study, but I'd think that you want to be looking at windows of very specific width (around the TSSs, +/- N nt) and therefore will be comparing sequences of identical length. No need to length normalize when everything is the same length.

        Comment

        • ppm
          Junior Member
          • Mar 2014
          • 3

          #5
          So, I have ChIPseq data for two cell-lines, therefore, two inputs.

          I am plotting TSS plots +/-1500 bp. I am using ngsplot to do this.

          When I just use enriched bam file or total input bam file, it gives me RPKM plotted on the Y-axis. These look very similar in case of both the cell lines.

          Next, when I plot enrichedvstotalInput for these cell lines. I see that one of the cell line is more enriched than the other. I am not sure why would this happen. Views will be much appreciated.

          Thanks

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          19 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          36 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...