Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Matt.Ralston
    Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 10

    Cufflinks is not pair-aware?

    Hello SeqAnswers!
    I am working with strand-specific RNA-sequencing data from a bacteria. I've attached a screenshot that demonstrates my issue.
    Background:
    I've used bowtie2 to map paired Illumina reads to the genome. I've split each BAM file by the fragment's strand (FR-stranded library using samtools and conditional statements). Below you see that the reads are colored according to the appropriate strand in IGV. The top track (purple) shows fragments from one replicate aligned to the reverse/minus strand. The second track from the top (pink) indicates fragments aligned to the forward/plus strand. The next two tracks are a biological replicate of the same condition.

    The annotation tracks (blue) are the existing CDS annotation, the top replicate's cufflinks assembly, and the merged assembly across all conditions.
    Problem:
    Below you will see that there are no purple fragments aligned to the minus/reverse strand near the central vertical bar (~9800bp) and yet Cufflinks must be assembling pairs in a pair-unaware manner, although I used the fr-firststrand argument. My 3' overhang tolerance is set to 10bp.

    Question:
    Has anyone else encountered this pair-unaware behavior in bacterial transcriptome assembly? Does anyone have any solid workarounds? Is there a parameter in cufflinks I should be aware of?

    Here is my cufflinks code:
    Code:
    $cufflinks -o $CUFFLINKS/${f} -p $CORES -b $REFFASTA -u -M $MASK -m 520 -s 49 -L $f -I 1 --min-intron-length 0 --max-multiread-fraction 0.2 --overlap-radius 5 --3-overhang-tolerance 10 --library-type fr-firststrand -g $REFERENCE --min-frags-per-transfrag 15 $INDIR/$f.3.bam

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
    by SEQadmin2


    Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


    The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
    ...
    06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
38 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
0 responses
101 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
0 responses
123 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
0 responses
114 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...