Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cast457
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2014
    • 4

    Determine different methylation patterns after Bismark

    Hi Guys,

    I have a bismark sam-file including 66 different targets. The next step will be to detect different subpopulations for all targets in terms of the CpG island - considering only the reads with a coverage of e.g. 80%. I am not interested in the statistics of every single CpG position. Since I have not found any tool for that, I wonder how I can do this step efficiently. What would be your approach?

    Cheers!
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    It's really unclear what you're actually trying to do. You say you're not interested in individual CpGs, which implies that you'd like to look at regions. Are the 66 different target different samples or did you perform targeted bisulfite sequencing? In the case of the latter, how big are the regions and would you like to just summarise methylation over them? If not, you'll need to provide more details on what you'd actually like to do.

    Comment

    • cast457
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2014
      • 4

      #3
      Sorry for being unclear. Well I have 66 different regions of interest. And so far I found serveral tools that gave me proportions of every single CpG (methylated - unmethylated) or show me fully methylated regions like CellMethy. However, I wanna see, which subpopulations are found in each region. Lets say we have a region with 4 CpGs. What patterns can be found in that region? X-x-x-x? Or also x-X-x-x?

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        You'd have to code something to do that then, it's not something most people are interested in looking at.

        Comment

        • cast457
          Junior Member
          • Sep 2014
          • 4

          #5
          That's what I've expected. I am writing a perl script and will put in on github.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          55 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...