Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • carolW
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 103

    raxml

    Hi,
    I don't know how the species' name should be in the phylip format for raxml. Even if there is no space in the name, I get the error msg

    ERROR: Problem reading number of species and sites

    I use either format below, I get this msg. How should the name appear?

    Look forward to your reply,

    Carol
    ---------------------------------------
    >1112142-1113254_NC_014152.1_Thermincola_potens_JR_chromosome,_complete_genome
    ATGCGCAGTTTGAAGGGGGTAATTTCCACATCTGCTCTGGAACTGGGGGTGGACTTGCCG
    GAACTGGA----GTTTTGCGTTTTGCTTCAACGGCTTCTGGCAGAGAGTAGG

    >1112142-1113254 NC_014152.1 Thermincola potens JR chromosome, complete genome
    ATGCGCAGTTTGAAGGGGGTAATTTCCACATCTGCTCTGGAACTGGGGGTGGACTTGCCG
    GAACTGGA----GTTTTGCGTTTTGCTTCAACGGCTTCTGGCAGAGAGTAGG
    >1109551-1110576 NC_014152.1 Thermincola potens JR chromosome, complete genome
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Phylip file format example for DNA is here: http://www.molecularevolution.org/re...ats/phylip_dna

    That said, RAXML manual says this about names:

    Prohibited Character(s) in taxon names are names that contain any form of whitespace character, like blanks, tabulators, and carriage returns, as well as one of the following prohibited characters: : or () or []
    Have you tried replacing the "." in GenBank ID's with something else?

    Comment

    • carolW
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 103

      #3
      No, your comment is correct but I think - in genomic coordinates should be replaced.

      It seems that a name processing should be carried out for all species name which is an extra work. I don't know if it is the same for other phylogeny soft.

      Many thanks

      Carol

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Does not hurt to try replacing the "-" too.

        There are many interesting requirements for other phylogeny software packages (e.g. program truncating the names to first 8 characters so you need to make that part unique etc). RAXML claims that it will take any 256 characters but we shall see if you can get past this first step by doing the two replacements.

        Comment

        • carolW
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2013
          • 103

          #5
          yes, it does. I should also have replaced the space, carriage return between name and seq, add number of seq and length of seq on the first line, etc. it means that the fasta format of the seq should be processed to be used with raxml.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            Today, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          6 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          7 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          30 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          28 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...