Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #16
    Oh, sorry, the command I gave you was for interleaved reads, so those are all false positive merges. For pairs in separate files, the command would be:

    bbmerge.sh in1=R1.fq in2=R2.fastq ihist=ihist.txt reads=100000

    As for whether you merge the reads before assembly, that depends on the assembler. AllPathsLG does its own merging; Ray seems to do well with merged reads; SoapDenovo creates worse assemblies with merged reads; there's no single rule. I've never used Geneious, so I don't know if it would help. As with many options, such as trimming and subsampling, sometimes the only way to get the best assembly is to try both ways.

    If you do merge the reads, I suggest using the default settings:

    bbmerge.sh in1=r1.fq in2=r2.fq out=merged.fq outu1=unmerged1.fq outu2=unmerged2.fq

    ...then feed the assembler both the merged and unmerged reads. Many or most assemblers will accept both paired and unpaired reads; merging should not be done for assemblers that don't allow you to feed them both paired and unpaired reads simultaneously, as low-complexity genomic regions will not merge as well.

    Comment

    • Marisa_Miller
      Member
      • Aug 2010
      • 34

      #17
      Originally posted by Brian Bushnell View Post
      The fraction joined and the position of the peak in the graph will make it clear what the real distribution is like. If the graph is still rising then abruptly drops to zero just before 2x(read length) then the insert sizes are generally too long for merging.
      Hi Brian,
      I re-ran bbmerge with the correct command, and it looks like the distribution shows the insert sizes are too big for merging. Although, the fraction joined is around 60% for most libraries, not sure if this is good or bad.
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #18


        For a 2x300bp library, getting 60% merging and a median of 400bp is pretty optimal for merging, actually. Again, whether merging is a good idea depends on the assembler, but this library is a good. You never see 90%+ merging unless the insert sizes came out way too short.
        Attached Files

        Comment

        • Marisa_Miller
          Member
          • Aug 2010
          • 34

          #19
          Originally posted by Brian Bushnell View Post


          For a 2x300bp library, getting 60% merging and a median of 400bp is pretty optimal for merging, actually. Again, whether merging is a good idea depends on the assembler, but this library is a good. You never see 90%+ merging unless the insert sizes came out way too short.
          I think I misunderstood earlier about what to look for in a library to see if it can be merged. I will go ahead and merge them and give the assembly a shot with both merged and unmerged. Thanks again!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          29 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          39 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          45 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...