Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • demienx
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2014
    • 4

    #1

    nothing aligned using bwa mem

    Hi there.
    I am using bwa to align human RNA-seq reads to rRNA database to exclude rRNA pollution. I tried both bwa backtrack and mem, and very strangely only backtrack could map some of my reads to rRNA reference, while mem mapped NONE. I think there must be something wrong but I just cannot figure out what. My command is listed below:
    backtrack:
    bwa aln -l 20 -f se-reads.sai rRNA.fa se-reads.gz && bwa samse -f se-read-backtrack.sam rRNA.fa se-reads.sai se-reads.gz
    mem:
    bwa mem -k 17 rRNA.fa se-reads.gz > se-read-mem.sam

    My reads were single-ended and the length was 28 bp. The input reads were fastq gzip files.

    And I'd like to post a same read for example that was mapped to rRNA reference using backtrack but was not mapped using mem.
    backtrack:
    GS85516-FS3:L02C002R005.7860.0 0 hsa_rRNA_EU597543_650:1603:+ 519 0 28M * 0 0 AAAGGACCTGGCGGTGCTTCATATCCCG ,,+/#*$#+$##$%,#)')0..1..)#) XT:A:R NM:i:1 X0:i:5519 XM:i:1 XO:i:0 XG:i:0 MD:Z:27T0
    mem:
    GS85516-FS3:L02C002R005.7860.0 4 * 0 0 * * 0 0 AAAGGACCTGGCGGTGCTTCATATCCCG ,,+/#*$#+$##$%,#)')0..1..)#)AS:i:0 XS:i:0

    I am very confused. Can anyone help me with this?
  • Ihavenoidea
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 2

    #2
    Hello,
    I work with miRNA data and I had the same problem, bwa-mem was mapping 1-5% of my reads, but when I used backtrack, my mapping got up to 80-85%. Mem is optimized for longer reads and doesn't work well for short fragments.
    Also, I have seen a lot of differences in the mapping depending on the specifity of my trimming, going from 60 to 80% with bwa-aln + samse.
    Hope is of any help for u!

    Comment

    • HESmith
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 512

      #3
      From the BWA-MEM abstract:

      "The algorithm is robust to sequencing errors and applicable to a wide range of sequence lengths from 70bp to a few megabases."

      The length of your example is 28bp - too short for this tool.

      Comment

      • demienx
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2014
        • 4

        #4
        Thank you Ihavenoidea. It seems very possible that the low mapping rate is due to my short read length. But could you tell me how long your miRNA read is?

        Comment

        • demienx
          Junior Member
          • Oct 2014
          • 4

          #5
          Hi HESmith,
          I should apologize for making such a simple mistake, and thank you for pointing it out for me. I originally thought that mem was suitable for a wider range of read length than backtrack.

          Comment

          • Ihavenoidea
            Junior Member
            • Mar 2014
            • 2

            #6
            Originally posted by demienx View Post
            Thank you Ihavenoidea. It seems very possible that the low mapping rate is due to my short read length. But could you tell me how long your miRNA read is?
            After efficiently trimming my samples are of about 20pbs

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            26 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            36 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            43 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...