Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • demienx
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2014
    • 4

    nothing aligned using bwa mem

    Hi there.
    I am using bwa to align human RNA-seq reads to rRNA database to exclude rRNA pollution. I tried both bwa backtrack and mem, and very strangely only backtrack could map some of my reads to rRNA reference, while mem mapped NONE. I think there must be something wrong but I just cannot figure out what. My command is listed below:
    backtrack:
    bwa aln -l 20 -f se-reads.sai rRNA.fa se-reads.gz && bwa samse -f se-read-backtrack.sam rRNA.fa se-reads.sai se-reads.gz
    mem:
    bwa mem -k 17 rRNA.fa se-reads.gz > se-read-mem.sam

    My reads were single-ended and the length was 28 bp. The input reads were fastq gzip files.

    And I'd like to post a same read for example that was mapped to rRNA reference using backtrack but was not mapped using mem.
    backtrack:
    GS85516-FS3:L02C002R005.7860.0 0 hsa_rRNA_EU597543_650:1603:+ 519 0 28M * 0 0 AAAGGACCTGGCGGTGCTTCATATCCCG ,,+/#*$#+$##$%,#)')0..1..)#) XT:A:R NM:i:1 X0:i:5519 XM:i:1 XO:i:0 XG:i:0 MD:Z:27T0
    mem:
    GS85516-FS3:L02C002R005.7860.0 4 * 0 0 * * 0 0 AAAGGACCTGGCGGTGCTTCATATCCCG ,,+/#*$#+$##$%,#)')0..1..)#)AS:i:0 XS:i:0

    I am very confused. Can anyone help me with this?
  • Ihavenoidea
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 2

    #2
    Hello,
    I work with miRNA data and I had the same problem, bwa-mem was mapping 1-5% of my reads, but when I used backtrack, my mapping got up to 80-85%. Mem is optimized for longer reads and doesn't work well for short fragments.
    Also, I have seen a lot of differences in the mapping depending on the specifity of my trimming, going from 60 to 80% with bwa-aln + samse.
    Hope is of any help for u!

    Comment

    • HESmith
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 512

      #3
      From the BWA-MEM abstract:

      "The algorithm is robust to sequencing errors and applicable to a wide range of sequence lengths from 70bp to a few megabases."

      The length of your example is 28bp - too short for this tool.

      Comment

      • demienx
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2014
        • 4

        #4
        Thank you Ihavenoidea. It seems very possible that the low mapping rate is due to my short read length. But could you tell me how long your miRNA read is?

        Comment

        • demienx
          Junior Member
          • Oct 2014
          • 4

          #5
          Hi HESmith,
          I should apologize for making such a simple mistake, and thank you for pointing it out for me. I originally thought that mem was suitable for a wider range of read length than backtrack.

          Comment

          • Ihavenoidea
            Junior Member
            • Mar 2014
            • 2

            #6
            Originally posted by demienx View Post
            Thank you Ihavenoidea. It seems very possible that the low mapping rate is due to my short read length. But could you tell me how long your miRNA read is?
            After efficiently trimming my samples are of about 20pbs

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
            0 responses
            12 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
            0 responses
            28 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
            0 responses
            22 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...