Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Asaf
    Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 20

    #1

    DESeq2 LRT insights

    Hi,
    We're working on a RNA binding protein and want to figure out if it binds different RNAs in 2 different conditions. We did an immunoprecipitation (IP) for the protein and prepared the RNA that was linked to the protein for sequencing. Eventually we have 4 libraries: total RNA in condition A, RNAs in IP in condition A, total in condition B and IP in condition B.
    I want to know which RNAs are more (or less) in the IP in condition A vs. B normalized by the total RNA in these conditions. I used LRT of DESeq2 like this:
    ddseq <- DESeq(ddseq, test="LRT", full=~group+condition, reduced=~group)
    where group is IP and total and condition is condition A and B. This should tell me if the condition influence the ratio between IP and Total.
    What I'm missing is the size of the effect. I can get the p-value from the results but I couldn't figure out how to see the effect of condition a vs B on the IP/Total. I'd appreciate your help.
    Thanks
  • Michael Love
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 333

    #2
    hi Asaf,

    The effect size is the column log2FoldChange in the results table. You can get more information on columns in the results table by inspecting the metadata columns:

    mcol(res, use.names=TRUE)

    Comment

    • Asaf
      Member
      • Jul 2014
      • 20

      #3
      Thanks Mike, it's much clearer now.
      However, after doing some thinking since I wrote the first post I now think that the formula should be:
      full=~group+condition+group:condition, reduced=~group+condition
      if I really want to test if the condition has an effect on IP/Total. Am I correct?

      Comment

      • Michael Love
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2013
        • 333

        #4
        Yes, sorry I skimmed the original post and just answered the question about the results table. You're right that you need to fit an interaction model and test the interaction term in order to test the ratio of ratios: IP/control / IP/control.

        But it appears you don't have biological replicates to fit the model with an interaction. The model with an interaction has four terms:

        intercept + group effect + condition effect + group:condition effect

        And you have only 4 samples if I read correctly. So there are no residual degrees of freedom to estimate the within-group variance. Is it possible to perform more replicates of some groups in the experiment to observe the variability within group and condition? At the least you could replicate one or both of the IPs?

        Comment

        • Asaf
          Member
          • Jul 2014
          • 20

          #5
          Thanks again,
          We have 2 replicates of all 4 libraries so we should have enough, I do get significant genes (13) and some of them even makes sense biologically .

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          9 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          19 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...