Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hreuver
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2015
    • 3

    #1

    Strange CRAMtools 2.1 issue

    Hi all,

    We have accumulated quite a lot of BAM files over the years and we would like (need) to archive the old(er) ones. We have tested CRAMtools 2.1 and we are very happy with the results. Since we are talking about thousands of BAM files, we cannot go without automation. But...

    The problem is as followed:
    - when I run CRAMtools in a job file, it terminates immediatly (throwing an exception).
    - when I copy the command from the job file and execute it on the head node or on the node it previously failed on, I have no issues what so ever.

    My job file looks like this:
    Code:
    #PBS -N DNAXXXXXX
    #PBS -j oe
    #PBS -o /data/results/CRAM_archive/2013/october//DNAXXXXXX.log
    #PBS -r y
    #PBS -q bs_secondary
    #PBS -m ea
    #PBS -M [email protected]
    #PBS -l nodes=1:ppn=12
    cp /data/results/BGI/DNAXXXXXX/DNAXXXXXX.bam /scratch/
    cp /data/results/BGI/DNAXXXXXX/DNAXXXXXX.bam.bai /scratch/
    java -jar /share/apps/cramtools-2.1.jar cram -I /data/results/BGI/DNAXXXXXX/DNAXXXXXX.bam -O /scratch/DNAXXXXXX.cram -R /data/references/GrCh37/GrCh37_reference.fa --preserve-read-names --capture-all-tags -L *8
    java -cp /share/apps/cramtools-2.1.jar net.sf.cram.ValidateCramFile -I /scratch/DNAXXXXXX.cram -R /data/references/GrCh37/GrCh37_reference.fa
    mv /scratch/DNAXXXXXX.cram /data/results/CRAM_archive/2013/october//
    rm -f /scratch/DNAXXXXXX.bam
    rm -f /scratch/DNAXXXXXX.bam.bai
    The exception I get when submitting the job file to torque:
    Code:
    Exception in thread "main" java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
            at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
            at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
            at net.sf.cram.CramTools.invoke(CramTools.java:93)
            at net.sf.cram.CramTools.main(CramTools.java:123)
    Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Uknown read or base category: 6
            at net.sf.cram.lossy.QualityScorePreservation.parseSinglePolicy(QualityScorePreservation.java:155)
            at net.sf.cram.lossy.QualityScorePreservation.parsePolicies(QualityScorePreservation.java:79)
            at net.sf.cram.lossy.QualityScorePreservation.<init>(QualityScorePreservation.java:39)
            at net.sf.cram.Bam2Cram.main(Bam2Cram.java:273)
            ... 6 more
    I have tried to include the full path to java to make sure the same version is used in all cases, but the problem remains.

    Does anyone have an idea what could cause this problem and how I can fix it?

    Many thanks,

    Rick
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Have you tried just using samtools to make the cram files? That should work reasonably well and allow you to just avoid whatever is causing this-.

    Comment

    • hreuver
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2015
      • 3

      #3
      Thanks for the suggestion! We do like 5,000 diagnostic WES samples (Illumina) each year and, even though we are only archiving BAM files that have expired the mandatory storage term, we apply strict quality measurements to our data. We have validated the use of CRAMtools very well and switching to samtools would probably mean we have to redo the entire validation process. If possible, I would like to prevent this.

      But this problem only occurs with our Illumina data (BWA). When I use the same job file for older BAM files (SOLiD, lifescope), I have no problems at all.

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        Your best bet is to create an issue report on github. This is being thrown here, which appears to be trying to parse something that's saying what to do with quality scores.

        Comment

        • hreuver
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2015
          • 3

          #5
          Many thanks for your suggestion! I have posted the issue on github and we have come to a solution:

          The code below used to work on our main server and it still works on another server when run through a job file. It still works on both servers when running from the command line directly on the node or on the head.

          java -jar /share/apps/cramtools-2.1.jar cram -I /data/results/BGI/DNAXXXXXX/DNAXXXXXX.bam -O /scratch/DNAXXXXXX.cram -R /data/references/GrCh37/GrCh37_reference.fa --preserve-read-names --capture-all-tags -L *8

          It stopped working on our main server when running the command from a job file. The solution was very simple: change -L *8 to -L '*8'

          It seems like this issue is caused by a system/evironment setting. I did have a look at this before, but I wasn't able to pin point why it is working on one machine, but not on the other.
          Last edited by hreuver; 01-26-2015, 08:57 AM.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          36 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...