Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mlacencio
    Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 13

    #1

    How can I distinguish assembly error from true splice or isoforms in RNA-seq?

    Hii everyone!

    I have received thousands of transcripts generated by a non-stranded RNA-seq and I have just annotated them (I used a in-house bash script to extract from blast results xml the most informative and frequent annotations from blast hits). However, I have found that many transcripts have the same annotation, e.g. two transcripts have been annotated as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase and so on.

    Please find attached a file containing some examples of blast alignments of these transcritps. Would you consider these cases as a result of wrong assembly? How can I distinguish assembly error from true splice or isoforms in RNA-seq? Moreover, can I consider two highly similar reverse complement transcripts as only one single transcripts since this is a non-stranded RNA-seq?

    Best regards,

    Marcio
    Attached Files
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    Many organisms have multiple copies of genes that may be slightly different. I would worry about classifying two sequences with only 89% or 95% identity as the same transcript. Assembly error rates should be far below that.

    But it may depend on the organism... is it haploid or diploid/polyploid?

    Comment

    • GenoMax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 7142

      #3
      Examples you included in your file are good hits over most entire length of those contigs. What method did you use to assemble the contigs? What was the average depth that led to that consensus sequence? Since this is non-stranded library you do have a 50-50 chance of sequencing either strand.

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        I may have misinterpreted something... are the Blast alignments you posted of the transcriptome to itself, or to some other database?

        Comment

        • mlacencio
          Member
          • Oct 2013
          • 13

          #5
          Hi Brian and GenoMax!

          The Blast alignments I posted are of the transcriptome to itself. Anyway, transcripts are from a tetraploid organism.

          GenoMax, the sequences have been assembled by someone else. I will have to check with him how he has assembled the reads.

          Best,

          Marcio

          Comment

          • Brian Bushnell
            Super Moderator
            • Jan 2014
            • 2709

            #6
            If it's tetraploid, then depending on the organism's degree of heterozygosity, those may very well be the same transcript from different ploidies (which would not really be considered misassemblies)... or they could be two copies of the same gene with different genomic coordinates. I don't know that there's an easy way to tell. If possible, I'd try to inbreed the organism as much as possible before doing assemblies.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            19 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            36 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...