Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pradhaun
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 16

    #1

    Bowtie2 --score-min option versus default alignment

    Hello All,

    I am using bowtie2 for mapping illumina reads (100 bp). Since I am trying to align the various different plant lines of same species to the reference genome, I would like to play with the mismatches within each read. Because, I cannot expect the 100 bp of a different plant line to match exactly with the reference genome. Therfore, I was using --score-min option, thereby I can manipulate the alignment score.

    For eg, bowtie2 --score-min L,0,-0.3, -x my_ref_index -1 read1.fq -2 read2.fq -S output.bam

    The above command allows 5 mismatches (1 mismatch = -6 penalty).

    But I am not very sure whether this is the right way to do it. I would really appreciate if anybody can please provide their suggestions. And is the default bowtie2 alignment differs from alignment with --score-min option, other than allowing 5 mismatches?

    Thanks!!
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    The default is L,-0.6,-0.6, so your option will allow fewer mismatches than the default, which probably isn't what you want. I should also note that the mismatch penalty isn't always 6, it varies with the base quality.

    Comment

    • Pradhaun
      Member
      • Nov 2011
      • 16

      #3
      Thanks for the quick reply drpryan.

      And thanks for pointing about default score. I will recheck my scoring system.

      I should have explained my question in a better way. Actually my question is, if I would like to see the alignment rate in a range of 0 to 5 mismatches, should I have to use --score-min L,0,0 for 0 mismatches or can I use the default alignment without any score-min option?

      bowtie2 --score-min L,0,0 -x index -1 read1.fq -2 read2.fq -S output.sam
      or
      bowtie2 -x index -1 read1.fq -2 read2.fq -S output.sam

      I am getting higher alignment rate for the latter compare to the former command (with --score-min option). As per my understanding, the above two commands are not doing the same thing. If yes, can you please explain the reasoning behind it? Why I am getting higher alignment rate when I am not using --score-min? I would really appreciate if you can clarify about this.

      Thanks!

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        It's simpler to just use the default settings and use grep to see how many alignments have a given edit distance (see the NM tag). This won't be perfect, since an InDel will be treated like a SNP, but it'll be a reasonable enough approach.

        Not specifying --score-min is the same as specifying "--score-min L,-0.6,-0.6", so it's unsurprising that you get a higher alignment rate when you allow mismatches than when you don't.

        Comment

        • Pradhaun
          Member
          • Nov 2011
          • 16

          #5
          Thanks dpryan.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          14 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
          0 responses
          19 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...