Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pradhaun
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 16

    #1

    Bowtie2 --score-min option versus default alignment

    Hello All,

    I am using bowtie2 for mapping illumina reads (100 bp). Since I am trying to align the various different plant lines of same species to the reference genome, I would like to play with the mismatches within each read. Because, I cannot expect the 100 bp of a different plant line to match exactly with the reference genome. Therfore, I was using --score-min option, thereby I can manipulate the alignment score.

    For eg, bowtie2 --score-min L,0,-0.3, -x my_ref_index -1 read1.fq -2 read2.fq -S output.bam

    The above command allows 5 mismatches (1 mismatch = -6 penalty).

    But I am not very sure whether this is the right way to do it. I would really appreciate if anybody can please provide their suggestions. And is the default bowtie2 alignment differs from alignment with --score-min option, other than allowing 5 mismatches?

    Thanks!!
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    The default is L,-0.6,-0.6, so your option will allow fewer mismatches than the default, which probably isn't what you want. I should also note that the mismatch penalty isn't always 6, it varies with the base quality.

    Comment

    • Pradhaun
      Member
      • Nov 2011
      • 16

      #3
      Thanks for the quick reply drpryan.

      And thanks for pointing about default score. I will recheck my scoring system.

      I should have explained my question in a better way. Actually my question is, if I would like to see the alignment rate in a range of 0 to 5 mismatches, should I have to use --score-min L,0,0 for 0 mismatches or can I use the default alignment without any score-min option?

      bowtie2 --score-min L,0,0 -x index -1 read1.fq -2 read2.fq -S output.sam
      or
      bowtie2 -x index -1 read1.fq -2 read2.fq -S output.sam

      I am getting higher alignment rate for the latter compare to the former command (with --score-min option). As per my understanding, the above two commands are not doing the same thing. If yes, can you please explain the reasoning behind it? Why I am getting higher alignment rate when I am not using --score-min? I would really appreciate if you can clarify about this.

      Thanks!

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        It's simpler to just use the default settings and use grep to see how many alignments have a given edit distance (see the NM tag). This won't be perfect, since an InDel will be treated like a SNP, but it'll be a reasonable enough approach.

        Not specifying --score-min is the same as specifying "--score-min L,-0.6,-0.6", so it's unsurprising that you get a higher alignment rate when you allow mismatches than when you don't.

        Comment

        • Pradhaun
          Member
          • Nov 2011
          • 16

          #5
          Thanks dpryan.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:13 AM
          0 responses
          14 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
          0 responses
          29 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...