Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mruhsam
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2014
    • 5

    Pulling out homologous sequences from different transcriptomes

    Hello,

    I have the assembled transcriptomes from 15 different (more or less closely related) species. I would like to pull out all the (presumeably homologous) contigs which occur in all the species so I can align them and build a phylogeny. I blasted one species against all the other ones and got a 5GB file but I don't know how I can pull out the contigs of species 1 which have a hit in all the 14 other species....

    Is there a program that can do that and give me a file with all the contigs which have a hit in all my species?

    Thanks for your help

    Markus
  • sarvidsson
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2015
    • 137

    #2
    Sorry, overlooked that you were talking about transcriptomes. For transcontigs, standalone InParanoid is worth a try - limited to protein coding transcontigs, however.
    Last edited by sarvidsson; 03-02-2015, 02:00 AM. Reason: Too quick

    Comment

    • mruhsam
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2014
      • 5

      #3
      Mauve is a good program to do the alignment but at the moment I don't have the input file to use Mauve, i. e. I don't have a file with all the contigs which occur in each of the 15 species. I don't know how I can pull out those contigs to create an input file in the first place.

      Comment

      • sarvidsson
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2015
        • 137

        #4
        See the edited post

        Comment

        • mruhsam
          Junior Member
          • Nov 2014
          • 5

          #5
          I actually had a look at InParanoid but got the impression that my data are compared to the data in their database. Or did I miss something there, i. e. can I use InParanoid to create pairwise comparisons between my data sets?

          Comment

          • sarvidsson
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2015
            • 137

            #6
            Originally posted by mruhsam View Post
            I actually had a look at InParanoid but got the impression that my data are compared to the data in their database. Or did I miss something there, i. e. can I use InParanoid to create pairwise comparisons between my data sets?
            You can make your own pairwise comparisons - but you need the standalone version (bottom of the page).

            Comment

            • GenoMax
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2008
              • 7142

              #7
              @mruhsam: Can you give us an idea of some numbers? How many contigs per species (or are you referring to transcript models assembled as "contigs", so thousands)? What is the size range on those contigs?

              Comment

              • mruhsam
                Junior Member
                • Nov 2014
                • 5

                #8
                There are well over 100.000 contigs for each species varying in length from 200 bp to about 20.000 bp.

                Comment

                • GenoMax
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 7142

                  #9
                  You may want to start with the largest of the lot (assuming they were assembled reasonably correctly) say 10K bp or more. If the species are very similar then you could use stringent search criteria. It sounds like depending on what you find you are going to need to some custom parsing of the results.

                  If you are able to convert these into protein sequences then OrthoMCL (like InParanoid mentioned above) would come in useful: http://www.orthomcl.org/orthomcl/

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • GATTACAT
                    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                    by GATTACAT
                    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                    by SEQadmin2


                    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                  0 responses
                  12 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                  0 responses
                  14 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                  0 responses
                  20 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                  0 responses
                  54 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...