Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • luxmare
    replied
    Hi Torst,
    Thank you for your reply. I agree with you. Quality scores of deletions is informative. But if the pileup format (made by BWA->SAMtools) was designed based on the IDEA you said, inserted bases should have base quality scores. Actually, however, inserted bases don't have qualities as below. I'm confusing...


    chr3 7759 C 4 ..,, SO]^
    chr3 7760 C 4 .+1G.,, \\\[ <-- 4 ref-type bases and 1 insertion, but only 4 qualities
    chr3 7761 G 4 ..,, GT[a

    Leave a comment:


  • Torst
    replied
    Originally posted by luxmare View Post
    I know that asterisks '*' in read bases column represent deletions as place holders in pileup format. But in my data, deletion '*' seems to has base quality score. why deleted bases have base qualities?
    I don't know how samtools handles this particularly, but the IDEA of giving a deletion a "quality score" is good. A quality score is essentially just a logarithm of a "probability of error" or "probability that this is wrong". So you can interpret it as a statistical confidence of the deletion being real.

    Leave a comment:


  • epigen
    replied
    The base quality is also a place holder just as the * in the reads column.

    I found similar occurrences in my data (created with samtools pileup -vcf), e.g.

    chr14 65392038 T A 0 0 0 1 * W

    Note that the weird consensus A must result from a floating underflow in the MAQ SNP calling model (http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawik...?title=SAM_FAQ). Although the FAQ answer says that this only happens in repetitive regions, the reference T is upper case and I just checked again in the UCSC Genome Browser for hg19 that there is no repeat. So I guess the reason is that there is only one read.

    Leave a comment:


  • luxmare
    started a topic deletion '*' has quality score in pileup?

    deletion '*' has quality score in pileup?

    I know that asterisks '*' in read bases column represent deletions as place holders in pileup format. But in my data, deletion '*' seems to has base quality score. why deleted bases have base qualities?

    In this example, there are 6 bases and 1 deletion at the site 25, and the number of base qualities is 7. Can I simply ignore the base quality 'a' corresponding to the deleted base?

    chr1 24 g 7 ,..,-1t.,, ``a]bb\
    chr1 25 t 7 ,..*.,, b[baaa`
    chr1 26 t 7 ,..,.,, a_baa]_

    Thanks in advance.

    FYI:

    I constructed pileup file by using the following command

    $ ./samtools-0.1.7a/samtools pileup -f reference.fa <in.bam> > <out.pileup>

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    New Genomics Tools and Methods Shared at AGBT 2025
    by seqadmin


    This year’s Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) General Meeting commemorated the 25th anniversary of the event at its original venue on Marco Island, Florida. While this year’s event didn’t include high-profile musical performances, the industry announcements and cutting-edge research still drew the attention of leading scientists.

    The Headliner
    The biggest announcement was Roche stepping back into the sequencing platform market. In the years since...
    03-03-2025, 01:39 PM
  • seqadmin
    Investigating the Gut Microbiome Through Diet and Spatial Biology
    by seqadmin




    The human gut contains trillions of microorganisms that impact digestion, immune functions, and overall health1. Despite major breakthroughs, we’re only beginning to understand the full extent of the microbiome’s influence on health and disease. Advances in next-generation sequencing and spatial biology have opened new windows into this complex environment, yet many questions remain. This article highlights two recent studies exploring how diet influences microbial...
    02-24-2025, 06:31 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 03-20-2025, 05:03 AM
0 responses
18 views
0 reactions
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-19-2025, 07:27 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-18-2025, 12:50 PM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
0 responses
187 views
0 reactions
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...