Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • suludana
    Member
    • May 2008
    • 61

    Chip-Seq Data

    Hi,

    I am starting to analyse my first Chip-Seq experiment (using an histone antibody).
    I obtained thousands of peaks.
    After using two filters (read number/peak and control sample no IP) I obtained approximatly 100 peaks per sample. Is it normal? Am I filtering too much?

    Thanks
  • kopi-o
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 319

    #2
    In case of histone modifications, regular peak callers may not be appropriate if the modification is diffuse and spread out over large genomic regions. Is that the case here? 100 peaks sounds like a small number. Perhaps your library has a relatively low enrichment over broad regions?

    Comment

    • Nix
      Member
      • Jun 2008
      • 60

      #3
      I'd recommend letting the data tell you how many peaks you have. Use an app that controls for overdispersion and calls p-values using say a negative binomial distribution and also control for multiple testing by converting the p-values to false discovery rates. By setting an FDR of say 1% (and possibly further filtering your list to those likely to have an effect say >2x) then you'll have something to work with that's based on measure of confidence given the noise in your data.

      Check out DESeq and edgeR if you like working with R or USeq (which wraps DESeq) for something a little more user friendly.

      Here's a tutorial I wrote http://useq.sourceforge.net/usage.html

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...