Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • timless
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2015
    • 3

    #1

    HISAT XS attribute

    Hi,

    I've been aligning some unstranded RNAseq data using HISAT, then using cuffdiff to create fpkm tables.

    I've encountered a problem where cuffdiff complains that the XS attribute is not present for spliced transcripts, but looking at my bam files there are many lines that contain XS tags.

    I still end up with FPKM tables, and they look ok. But can I trust them?

    I ran the same data through tophat then cuffdiff and got no errors from cuffdiff.

    Any suggestions welcomed.

    Thanks,
    Tim
    Last edited by timless; 03-24-2015, 08:10 PM.
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    I have encountered nothing but trouble with the Tuxedo pipeline and suggest you try alternatives such as DESeq. The XS tag is not part of the sam specification; it's very confusing, and the fact that CuffLinks (etc) requires it is just evidence that the tool is half-baked.

    Comment

    • Daehwan Kim
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2012
      • 4

      #3
      In HISAT, XS attributes are not reported for alignments involving non-GT/AG splice sites. You can direct HISAT not to output such alignments using "--pen-noncansplice 1000000".

      Thanks,
      Daehwan

      Comment

      • timless
        Junior Member
        • Mar 2015
        • 3

        #4
        Thanks for your help Daehwan, is there any way to get HISAT to put XS attributes on non-canonical splice junctions?

        Do you think having splice junctions without the XS tag will have affected the results generated by cuffdiff?

        Thanks,
        Tim

        Comment

        • Daehwan Kim
          Junior Member
          • Oct 2012
          • 4

          #5
          Hi Tim,

          This version of HISAT doesn't have a way to output correct XS attributes for non-canonical splice sites, but hopefully I'll do some work to solve that problem in the near future. I think your tests with or w/o that option shouldn't affect differential analysis for transcripts involving canonical splice sites, but please feel free to let me know if you encounter something unexpected in your analysis.

          Thanks,
          Daehwan

          Comment

          • timless
            Junior Member
            • Mar 2015
            • 3

            #6
            Ok, thanks again for your help Daehwan.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              Yesterday, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            11 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
            0 responses
            14 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 09-29-2026, 09:51 AM
            0 responses
            78 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...