I learned that estimated false positive SNP rate=1- (observed_ti/tv_ratio-0.5)/(expected_ti/tv_ratio-0.5). In one of our re-sequencing data, the observed ti/tv ratio for coding region is 3.0 (while expected ti/tv ratio for exome is 2.8). But false positive rate can not be negative...
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
I used google:Originally posted by yi2004 View PostDoes anybody know why the false positive SNP rate is estimated as
1- (observed_ti/tv_ratio-0.5)/(expected_ti/tv_ratio -0.5)?
Any reference to this is much appreciated.
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?
Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating...-
Channel: Articles
10-14-2026, 09:55 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Genome Sequencing Reveals Large, Repeat-Rich DNA in Trapdoor Spider Named for Stephen Colbert
by SEQadmin2
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:57 AM
|
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Yesterday, 09:57 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:51 AM
|
0 responses
11 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Yesterday, 09:51 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
|
0 responses
67 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
|
0 responses
47 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
|
Comment