Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JamieHeather
    @jamimmunology
    • Nov 2012
    • 96

    SeqMonk RNAseq QC plot error (>100 exon?)

    I've just started exploring SeqMonk, just looking at human total RNA-seq data to check the distribution of different types of RNA.

    However, when I run the RNA-seq QC plot option I get the following error:

    Percent in exons was >100 for accepted_hits.bam
    I imagine this is systemic of some larger discrepancy in my analysis (or at least I hope so, because this was an rRNA-depleted data-set that SeqMonk is claiming has ~75% of reads in rRNA!), but I can't seem to find what that may be.

    The steps up to here basically involved using the iGenome hg19 as a custom genome, importing my accepted hits from TopHat, setting probes from the default running window generator settings and then doing basic read count quantitation.

    Have I just done something silly, or is something strange afoot?
  • JamieHeather
    @jamimmunology
    • Nov 2012
    • 96

    #2
    OK problem solved! It was something to do with the way that I'd built the custom genome - when I just imported an Ensembl genome via SeqMonk and re-ran the QC the error went away (as did the presence of rRNA mapping reads, thankfully!).

    Comment

    • GenoMax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 7142

      #3
      Did your rRNA-depleted samples actually have rRNA (if SeqMonk was reading your data right) or was that just an artifact?

      Comment

      • JamieHeather
        @jamimmunology
        • Nov 2012
        • 96

        #4
        I believe that was just an artifact.

        I'm not sure exactly what it was about using the custom hg19 genome (I'd just thought that was the sensible choice given that's what I used for my reference with TopHat), but everything now looks as I'd expected it to.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...