Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ileanadrt
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2015
    • 5

    #1

    Help with FastQC results

    Hi,
    I have two sets of Illumina Single End RNA-Seq 50 bp data (two differents days of mammalian cell culture). The kit used was KAPA Stranded RNA-Seq Kit with RiboErase.

    Unfortunately the results from FastQC are not as expected. But the problem is that I am not exactly sure how to interpret the data and what to say about the plots.

    Both datasets show the same results. The plot of per base sequence quality is OK (I think) and also the plot of Adapter content, but the plots of GC content and Kmer content look very weird. Also, the duplication levels.

    I am happy to get any advices about what is wrong in this data or possible explanations for this results.

    Thanks for any help

    Ileana

    First three results of
    Overrepresented sequences:
    Sequence
    CGACGGGGGGCCCCGCGGGGCCGAGAAGAAGAGGAGGGGGAGGCGAGGAGG Count: 187325
    Percentage: 1.0857026079582217
    Possible Source: No Hit

    Sequence GGACAGGAGAGCGGTCGCGCCGTGGGAGGGGCGGCCCGGCCCCCACCGCGG Count: 98598
    Percentage: 0.571456590094567
    Possible Source: No Hit

    Sequence CCCGAGACGAGTGGCTCTCCGCACCGGTCCCCGGTCCCGACGCGCGGCGGG Count: 95732
    Percentage: 0.5548457603899987
    Possible Source: No Hit
    Attached Files
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Out of the graphs you attached the GC content one looks rather strange. Is this known to be an extremely GC rich organism?

    Comment

    • ileanadrt
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2015
      • 5

      #3
      No, the GC content is around 40%

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Have you checked a few sequences (e.g. by blast) to see if they are from the right organism (and are not some kind of contamination)?

        Comment

        • ileanadrt
          Junior Member
          • Jun 2015
          • 5

          #5
          I did a quick search and didn't found possible contamination. Could be some rRNA and / or mitochondrial RNA? I did found some of these.

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            Neither of those should skew GC content that way. Perhaps someone else will have further suggestions.

            You should go ahead and start analyzing the data.

            Comment

            • nucacidhunter
              Jafar Jabbari
              • Jan 2013
              • 1250

              #7
              According to plots GC content of reads is 60%. This seems to be result of some GC rich reads with high duplication rates (20% has over 10 k dup rate). I would check reads with dup rate over 1k to see what they are and if they make bilogical sense. If they are not rRNA or from repetative regions, I would suspect some library prep issues.

              Comment

              • AdrianaGeldart
                Junior Member
                • Feb 2014
                • 6

                #8
                Dear Ileanadrt,

                I am a member of the Kapa Biosystems Technical Support Team.

                We would love to help you troubleshoot this further. Would you be willing to share the type of mammalian cell line you are using?

                Thanks and best regards,
                Adriana

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                  We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                  ...
                  09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
                0 responses
                16 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
                0 responses
                15 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                0 responses
                35 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                0 responses
                42 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...